Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 1 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend (1 Shares)  

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   1 comment
OpEdNews Op Eds

Killing all alleged suspects in Paris attacks, a tell tale sign "official" narrative is suspect

By       Message Dave Lefcourt     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Valuable 3   Must Read 1   Well Said 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H3 11/20/15







From youtube.com/watch?v=a5bEnvFllsE: Raw Video Shootout Between Police & Terrorists Outside Bataclan, Paris Raw Video Shootout Between Police & Terrorists Outside Bataclan, Paris Raw Video Shootout Between Police & Terrorists Outside Bataclan, Paris Raw Video ...
Raw Video Shootout Between Police & Terrorists Outside Bataclan, Paris Raw Video Shootout Between Police & Terrorists Outside Bataclan, Paris Raw Video Shootout Between Police & Terrorists Outside Bataclan, Paris Raw Video ...
(Image by OkkyCahyaningrum)
  Permission   Details   DMCA

Video taken of police shootout with alleged terrorists in Paris, November 13, 2015



Let's get directly to the point. If the Paris attacks were a false flag operation, the hypothesis here is the horror of it all is so great, most people wouldn't allow themselves to believe it causing too much cognitive dissonance.

Further, that the French government (or our own as we shall shortly see) could descend into such diabolical, sinister behavior is beyond the pale; killing its own people intentionally is incomprehensible to them.

Then lastly, if anyone were to contemplate such thoughts, they'd immediately be ridiculed and branded as a conspiracy theorist.

Significantly, those who plan and authorize false flag operations know the general public will believe the narrative the government is spouting as well as the "reports" coming from their handmaiden MSM.

As always, if the horror is so great, the public wants to know what happened immediately. If the narrative "reported" by the government and the MSM is "terrorists", names and faces given as suspects, particularly today if depicted as Islamic Jihadists, before an investigation confirms their complicity in the crime, it's pretty much taken as the gospel by the masses.

What's also notable any subsequent investigation authorized by the government to get the "facts" will generally substantiate the original narrative.

Perhaps a little historical perspective is in order:

In the case of the Kennedy assassination, from early on it was the lone gunman theory. Lee Harvey Oswald was the assassin. The Warren Commission "confirmed" it. Of course, over the years the Commission's "findings" have pretty much been debunked. Now most people either reject it, consider whether Oswald actually did it as "murky" at best or it's been so long ago people don't care any longer.

Ten years before the Kennedy assassination the CIA initiated a coup and helped overthrow the legitimately elected government in Iran in 1953. The actual truth of it was never revealed at the time. It was a clandestine operation. It took 60 years until August 2013 for the CIA to admit it was behind the '53 coup. Even with this revelation Iran has been so demonized since its 1979 revolution-a result directly connected to the '53 coup, known by the Iranian people with America directly behind it-and the taking of American embassy personnel hostage- not to mention Iran's nuclear program and the potential for it to develop a nuclear weapon-that long ago American coup in Iran is long forgotten.

In the early 60's, with the American government still fulminating over the 1959 Cuban revolution that brought Fidel Castro to power, even after multiple failed attempts to assassinate the Cuban leader and the disastrous CIA inspired "Bay of Pigs" fiasco, the Pentagon's Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Curtis Le May came up with "Operation Northwood's", a plan to down an American passenger plane, blame it on Castro and be the incident to initiate an invasion of Cuba. President Kennedy rejected the plan but it clearly signaled killing innocent Americans in some false flag operation to initiate war was now in the playbook.

In 1965, it was reported a Tonkin Gulf incident was initiated by the North Vietnamese against the American Navy. That incident resulted in the US Congress authorizing the "Gulf of Tonkin Resolution" which was the basis for President Lyndon Johnson to escalate the Viet Nam war. That "incident" never happened. It was a false flag attack-not exactly "Operation Northwood's"- but it served the same purpose. A war with over 59,000 G.I.'s and millions of Vietnamese paying the ultimate price.

Building 7[1], the smaller building immediately adjacent to the World Trade Center Twin Towers that fell on 9/11 also came down that day straight down on its own footprint. it was never hit by planes flying into it. What brought it down? A video taken of Building 7 shows it collapsing in freefall which appears identical to old casinos in Las Vegas being demolished in the same manner i.e. controlled demolition.

But getting back to the Paris attacks of Nov.13. It's been a week and the "official" narrative remains, it was European, Islamic Jihadists that were the culprits. All dead now including the alleged mastermind Abdelhamid Abaasoud who apparently was killed in a raid Wednesday morning north of Paris. He had been sought in a nationwide manhunt.

One would think for a thorough investigation attempts would be made to capture suspects-particularly the "mastermind"- in order to confirm suspicions he and they were in fact the actual perpetrators. That killing the alleged suspects is preferable today becomes a tell tale sign the "official" government narrative is itself suspect.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

- Advertisement -

Valuable 3   Must Read 1   Well Said 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

dglefc22733@aol.com
Retired. The author of "DECEIT AND EXCESS IN AMERICA, HOW THE MONEYED INTERESTS HAVE STOLEN AMERICA AND HOW WE CAN GET IT BACK", Authorhouse, 2009

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon



Go To Commenting
/* The Petition Site */
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Related Topic(s): ; ; , Add Tags

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

An Ominous Foreboding, Israel vs Iran

The Evolving Populist Political Rebellion in the Arab World

A Nuclear War Would Be Insane

The Rich Get Richer, the Poor Get Poorer, While the Middle Class Gets Decimated

CIA in the Crosshairs

Iran Offers 9 Point Plan to end Nuclear Crisis, U.S. "No thanks".