Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 1 (1 Shares)  

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   No comments
Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

Join Campaign to Protect Truth-Tellers now!

By       Message James Murtagh     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Become a Fan
  (8 fans)
- Advertisement -

2008 continues to be a banner year to increase consumer protection, and to increase support for truth tellers. Before this year, Congress was more likely to shoot the messanger than to protect whistleblower. But now, the public knows that whistleblowers are like Canaries in the Coalmine. Federal servants cannot protect the public, unless truth-telling officials are protected from corrupt bosses.

"We are not resting on our laurels" vowed Tom Devine, Esq., legal director of the Government Accountability Project. "We are going to leverage our wins to finally pass the most comprehensive whistleblower protection legislation in history! Together, 112 public interest groups joined to pass our consumer safety legislation. That is just the start. We need 200 groups to pass the next challenge!"

 "The International Association of Whistleblowers joins with all of our coalition partners at the Make It Safe Coalition." stated Dr. James Murtagh, co-chair of the IAW. "We will not rest until every local, state and national public interest group signs onto this effort, and recruits every Congressperson to back honesty in government. This bill is the most sweeping reform that could abolish corruption in our time. It is too important."

 Every newspaper editor reading this article is urged to republish it. Every group is urged to contact GAP to lend their support in the most intense anti-corruption drive ever. Now is the time to recover truth in both government and coporate spheres. 

 Leaders of Washington's most prestigious public interest groups urge every public interest group in the nation to join in supporting:

Whistleblower Protection Act Amendments – H.R. 985 and S. 274

Why are Amendments to the Whistleblower Protection Act Necessary?

• In 1989, Congress unanimously passed the Whistleblower Protection Act (“WPA”) for the federal civil service as the strongest free speech law in history, on paper. Unfortunately, the law has been functionally overturned by a series of increasingly hostile case decisions from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, which holds a monopoly on judicial review of whistleblower cases. In practice it has become an efficient mechanism to rubber stamp retaliation – an enforcement weapon for secrecy, instead of a shield for freedom of speech.

- Advertisement -

• Although the law on paper protects “any” lawful disclosure an employee “reasonably believes evidence” significant misconduct, the Court now excludes the most common situations in which whistleblower disclosures are made, including if the whistleblower disclosure is made in the course of doing one’s job duties (like an auditor or safety inspector), or if someone else previously has pointed out the same misconduct. The court translated “reasonably believes evidences” into “irrefragable proof,” defined as “incapable of being overthrown, incontestable, undeniable, or incontrovertible.”

• The bottom line is that government whistleblowers virtually always lose hearings and appeals when they challenge retaliation, which means the law is hurting freedom of speech more than it is helping. Since Congress unanimously strengthened the law in 1994, whistleblowers are on the losing end of a 2-201 track record for decisions on the merits by the Federal Circuit of Appeals, which has a monopoly on appellate review.

• The attacks on September 11, 2001, resulted in a wave of whistleblowing by those on the frontlines protecting the United States from further acts of terrorism. Unfortunately, these employees are the most vulnerable to retaliation when they disclose government wrongdoing that is threatening U.S. national security. The first tactic used by managers fearing criticism and embarrassment if security failings are exposed is to silence security professionals by suspending or revoking their security clearance. There is currently no independent review of security clearance revocations, so this type of retaliation almost always results in the termination of the employee who spoke out.

• Jury trials for cases of whistleblower retaliation are necessary because they have long been recognized as a whistleblower’s only genuine opportunity for a fair day in court – with justice decided by the taxpayers who the employee purports to defend while risking professional termination. In 2002, Congress provided that right to corporate workers. In July 2005, it extended the right to Department of Energy and Nuclear Regulatory Commission whistleblowers. The current administrative hearing process is hopelessly politicized, with a 2-53 track record against whistleblowers since the current Bush Administration appointee, Neil McPhie, became Chairman of the Merit Systems Protection Board in 2003.


- Advertisement -

What would the amendments do?

§         The amendments codify the legislative history of “any” protected disclosure, restoring the scope of protection already approved by three unanimous votes, overturning a series of activist decision from the Federal Circuit that gutted the original scope of protection for employees.

§         The House bill grants jury trials to federal whistleblowers.

Next Page  1  |  2


- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

James J. Murtagh, Jr. is a doctor of pulmonary, critical care and sleep medicine, and the Medical Director of several sleep laboratories in Southern Ohio. Dr. Murtagh extensively writes on medical ethics. Dr. Murtagh is the founder of a new (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
/* The Petition Site */
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Why Sister Aloysius "Doubts"

Sarah Palin is the Ultimate RINO

Patients and Doctors Demand Integrity in Medicine!

Sarah Palin is National Traitor

Should al-Qaeda have the right to bear arms?