Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 18 Share on Twitter 3 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds   

It's All a Russia/Al-Qaeda/WikiLeaks/"Rogue" FBI Plot

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages)   3 comments
Become a Premium Member Would you like to know how many people have read this article? Or how reputable the author is? Simply sign up for a Advocate premium membership and you'll automatically see this data on every article. Plus a lot more, too.
Author 73066
Message Pepe Escobar
Become a Fan
  (188 fans)

From Strategic Culture

From gma.yahoo.com/fbi-director-james-comey-face-questions-clinton-investigation-083304338--abc-news-topstories.html: FBI Director James Comey
From gma.yahoo.com/fbi-director-james-comey-face-questions-clinton-investigation-083304338--abc-news-topstories.html: FBI Director James Comey
(Image by Unknown Owner)
  Details   DMCA

Among the House of Cards-infested cliffhangers that defined the circus is in town US election (to quote Nobel Prize winner Bob Dylan's Desolation Row), the key question in the lead-up towards Election Day was why the FBI finally folded.

FBI Director James Comey, at the 11th hour, ended up delivering another letter to Congress, marveling how his team has been working around the clock studying no less than 650,000 emails on the laptop belonging to Anthony Weiner, the sex pervert estranged husband of Hillary Clinton's top aid Huma Abedin.

Comey finally concluded the FBI had not found anything to change its previous verdict regarding Hillary's Subterranean Email Server. Extreme carelessness, yes; but no criminal wrongdoing.

All this while among the twitter.com/wikileaks.

Podesta emails published by WikiLeaks, an explicit admission can be found in a November 10, 2008 internal review that the Clinton Foundation was breaking the law.

Moreover, The Big Picture had been quite clear all along; the Clinton Foundation as well as the Clinton Global Initiative were both operated as political organizations totally focused on boosting pay to play.

A case could be made that the first Comey letter to Congress was a response to an FBI internal revolt. Agents that were part of the insurgency are not likely to quit the long game -- even after the election. They have made sure that the real deal is with the Clinton Foundation, not Hillary's emails.

So leaks are bound to continue. Even before the first Comey letter, FBI insurgents swore there already is enough to indict. They insisted, Comey has been trying to stall because he does not want to face the Clinton machine, as well as the rest of Washington D.C. They were sure foreign powers are in possession of some of the documents we have analyzed, because they were hacked from the Clinton server.

The insurgents, for the sake of clarity, were insisting that the buck stopped with the Clinton Foundation, which sold influence, intel, favors to anyone willing to pay. Obama was tied in with the same people who donate to the Clinton Foundation. On that notorious, secret Bill Clinton meeting with Attorney General Loretta Lynch -- an Obama asset -- they maintained that Clinton wanted Loretta Lynch to focus on the email server and shy away from prosecuting the foundation.

In a nutshell; in the Clinton Foundation dossier there's allegedly enough information to bring the whole US government (USG) down.

And over Hillary, specifically, hangs an incendiary charge; SAPs (Special Access Programs) were found on her server.

The insurgents clarified how a SAP is an intelligence program classified above top-secret. They are held on closed servers at secret locations. The only way to get one is if you are specifically read on to a program, have a need to know, then you must physically go to a location and pass through several layers of security to even look at the program. SAP is granted on a need to know basis, and Hillary did not have any need to know any of the programs on her server .

All that was still not enough to get an indictment out of the FBI. Well, certainly not before Election Day, considering that if the FBI went ahead it would be facing no less than the full might/wrath of the USG.

A New York source with solid business/financial connections among the Masters of the Universe came up with a quite cryptic answer when I posed him some of the questions raised above:

Next Page  1  |  2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

 

Must Read 1   Well Said 1   Supported 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Pepe Escobar Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Pepe Escobar is an independent geopolitical analyst. He writes for RT, Sputnik and TomDispatch, and is a frequent contributor to websites and radio and TV shows ranging from the US to East Asia. He is the former roving correspondent for Asia (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

You Want War? Russia is Ready for War

Why Putin is driving Washington nuts

All aboard the New Silk Road(s)

Why Qatar wants to invade Syria

It was Putin's missile?

Where is Prince Bandar?

To View Comments or Join the Conversation: