This piece was reprinted by OpEd News with permission or license. It may not be reproduced in any form without permission or license from the source.
Nobody actually knows where beliefs come from. Psychologists can't explain what makes some people religious skeptics and others believers or why some become conformists and others become rebels or political conservatives and liberals or war "hawks" and peace "doves" or puritans and playboys or death-penalty advocates and opponents etc., etc.
Therefore, I don't know what caused me to be a doubter while my classmates were believers, some even becoming preachers. All I know is my own story:
I was born in 1932 in a little West Virginia farm town that had no electricity or paved streets. My family had gaslights, but farmers outside town lived with kerosene lamps, woodstoves, outdoor toilets.
I was sent to Bible Belt Sunday schools, and tried to pray as a child. But an awakening occurred in teen years. In high school chemistry class, I learned how gaps and surpluses in outer electron shells cause atoms to bind into molecules, making almost everything in our world. It was a revelation explaining much of existence. Science became an obsession, a portal to understanding reality. Slowly, religion's claims of invisible gods, devils, heavens, hells, angels, demons, miracles and messiahs turned into fairy tales.
Rather by accident, I lucked into a newspaper job, and my world expanded. A cynical city editor laughed at "holy rollers" and huckster evangelists. We debated religion. I agreed that supernatural church claims are baloney but I had a quandary: If the magical explanations are nonsense, I said, what better answers exist? Why is the universe here? Why do we live and die? Is there any purpose to it all? Is everything random? What can an honest person say? What answer can a person of integrity give?
He eyed me sharply and replied: "You can say: I don't know." Bingo! Immediately, a path of honesty opened for me. Previously, I had sensed that it's dishonest for theologians to claim supernatural knowledge without any proof, but I had lacked a truthful alternative. Now I had one. I could quit agonizing and admit that ultimate mysteries are unknowable.
I joined a skeptical Unitarian group, read physics and philosophy books, and cemented a scientific worldview. Beliefs should rest on intelligent evidence, not on fables. Eventually, I saw several logical reasons why thinking people should reject church dogmas:
Horrible occurrences such as the Indian Ocean tsunami that drowned 100,000 children prove clearly that the universe isn't administered by an all-loving invisible father. No compassionate creator would devise killer earthquakes and hurricanes or breast cancer for women and leukemia for children or hawks to rip rabbits apart and pythons to crush pigs and sharks to slaughter seals. A creator who concocted such things would be crueler than people are. In philosophy, this dilemma is called the Problem of Evil. It doesn't disprove the existence of a heartless god, but it wipes out the merciful god of churches.
Hundreds of past gods and religions have vanished, and are laughable today. Zeus's Pantheon atop Mount Olympus was so real to ancient Greeks that they sacrificed thousands of animals to the imaginary gods and goddesses. Are today's deities any more substantial?
Although churches claim that religion makes believers loving and brotherly, the historic record includes opposite results. Human sacrifice, holy wars, Inquisition torture chambers, massacres of heretics, Crusades against infidels, witch hunts, Reformation wars, pogroms against Jews, Jonestown, Waco, nerve gas in Tokyo's subway, suicide bombing by today's Muslim fanatics--all these undercut the kindly image of believers.
Most of the brightest thinkers throughout history--philosophers, scientists, writers, democracy reformers, and other "greats"--have been skeptics. Omar Khayyam, Michel de Montaigne, William Shakespeare, Voltaire, Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Paine, Ralph Waldo Emerson, Henry David Thoreau, Charles Darwin, Leo Tolstoy, Mark Twain, Thomas Edison, Luther Burbank, Sigmund Freud, Bertrand Russell, Albert Einstein, Margaret Sanger, Will Durant, Jean-Paul Sartre, Isaac Asimov, Kurt Vonnegut, Carl Sagan--this is illustrious company. If the best minds couldn't swallow supernatural tenets, why should we?
Scientific thinking requires detectable, testable evidence. But religion offers no proof except writings left by long-dead holy men. Muhammad said the angel Gabriel dictated the Koran to him. That's proof enough for a billion Muslims. Joseph Smith, a convicted fraud artist, said an angel named Moroni helped him find buried golden tablets, which he translated into miracle-filled scriptures. That's proof enough for millions of Mormons. But honest seekers need something more tangible.
Despite the common assumption that church leaders are more moral than ordinary folks, a horrifying number of ministers and priests are child-molesters, swindlers, adulterers, or half-cracked charlatans. A few even commit murder. There's no evidence that religion makes them holier than thou.
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).
1
1
1
