Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on LinkedIn Share on Reddit Tell A Friend Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites
OpEdNews Op Eds

Is the political imperative to be "tough on crime" finally over?

By       Message Trevor Timm       (Page 1 of 1 pages)     Permalink    (# of views)   No comments

Related Topic(s): ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H3 7/18/15

Author 87840
Become a Fan
  (2 fans)
- Advertisement -

Reprinted from The Guardian

From Barack Obama to Hillary Clinton, and from Rand Paul to John Boehner, politicians seem to realize that putting so many people in prison isn't popular

From President Barack Obama
President Barack Obama
(Image by YouTube)
  Permission   Details   DMCA

- Advertisement -

Spurred on by the historic #BlackLivesMatter movement and the increasing realization our enormous prison population is both inhumane and costing us a fortune, presidential candidates -- who once competed with one another over who was "tougher on crime" -- are falling all over themselves to praise reform efforts meant to reduce the number of prisoners in the US. Even more shocking: it's coming from both parties. But will the much-needed attention lead to actual change?

President Barack Obama this week became the first sitting president to visit a federal prison, where he sounded more like a prison rights activist than a law-and-order president in his fantastic speech on the injustices faced by incarcerated Americans. He even ticked off statistics lamenting how the US to become by far the biggest jailer in the world: the US has only 5% of the world's population but 25% of its prisoners; we have four times as many prisoners as China; and African-Americans and Latinos are 30% of the US population yet make up 60% of prison inmates.

Before that, Hillary Clinton's first major policy speech of her presidential campaign was not on the economy or foreign policy, but on criminal justice reform. "It's time to end the era of mass incarceration" she said. While she was rightly criticized for being short on specifics, it's still a testament to how the issue now requires the attention of any standard bearer of the Democratic party -- especially given her husband's role in perpetuating the problem in the 1990s.

- Advertisement -

And Bill Clinton, for his part, apologized this week for passing his administration's "tough on crime" bill in the 1990s, which for many years he openly bragged about. "I signed a bill that made the problem worse," he told the NAACP this week. "And I want to admit it."

Click Here to Read Whole Article


- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

Trevor Timm is a co-founder and the executive director of the Freedom of the Press Foundation. He is a writer, activist, and lawyer who specializes in free speech and government transparency issues. He has contributed to  The (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon Share Author on Social Media   Go To Commenting

The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Sen. Dianne Feinstein's New NSA Bill Will Codify and Extend Mass Surveillance of Americans

Everyone loves Bernie Sanders. Except, it seems, the Democratic party

DOJ Investigation of AP Part of Larger Pattern to Intimidate Sources and Reporters

Why the Panama Papers should be a US election issue

If Trump leaks are OK and Clinton leaks aren't, there's a problem

One good thing about Donald Trump's campaign: it's ruining Jeb Bush's