Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 8 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H2'ed 6/30/15

In Tax Battles, "Competitiveness" Means Coercion

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages)   1 comment
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Dave Johnson
Become a Fan
  (12 fans)

Reprinted from Campaign For America's Future

Corporations rule the world...
Copyrighted Image? DMCA

Watch out for this one. With fast track trade authority done, the big corporations are now pushing for massive tax giveaways. This is another exercise of raw corporate power by the few to take what they want from the many. The corporations use complexity to get people to tune out, and their schemes are masked by smooth words like "reform" and "competitiveness," but it is all just another grab for (even more) money and power.

There are two areas where the corporations are coming at us. The first is a blatant grab to keep somewhere up to $700 billion in tax money they already owe on "offshore" profits. The second is a push to permanently cut corporate tax rates -- even more.

Taxes Owed On Offshore Profits

Multinational corporations avoid paying U.S. taxes using a "deferral" loophole. This loophole lets them dodge taxes on profits made outside of the country until they bring the profits back into the country (called "repatriation").

Thanks to this loophole, multinational corporations have been engaging in all kinds of schemes to make it appear as if profits were made outside the country. And then they keep the profits out of the country and away from the taxes they owe. This has been going on for a while, the amounts have been building up, and now we're talking about more than $2 trillion in profits, which means somewhere up to $700 billion in taxes owed. (A hundred billion here, a hundred billion there, after a while it starts to add up to real money.)

One way multinational corporations make it look as if these profits were made outside of the U.S. is by using complexity. They set up corporations that appear to be based in tax-haven countries but are really subsidiaries of the U.S.-based parent corporation. So in effect, it is really the same corporation moving money around to different branches, masked by the complexity of subsidiary corporations and borders.

Example: A corporation reports that it pays a fee to a "foreign company" to "license" intellectual property, such as patents, copyrights and designs. The foreign company is really just a subsidiary corporation set up in a tax-haven country -- often consisting of little more than a mailbox -- and the ownership of the intellectual property is transferred from the parent to this "non-U.S. company." This mailbox "foreign company" charges the parent for use of the IP, and the parent reports that the profits are made by the "foreign company." Electronics, software, pharmaceuticals " even shoes might be sold in the U.S. but using these schemes the profits appear to go to the licensor (mailbox) in the tax-haven country. Even worse, another common scheme involves moving actual manufacturing or other production (and the jobs) to a subsidiary corporation outside of the U.S. and selling the goods back to the U.S. parent for a high price, so much or all of the profit is made there, not here.

The "foreign" subsidiary corporation has the profits, and the parent corporation is considered profitable because it owns the mailboxes subsidiaries. But the corporation doesn't have to actually pay the taxes on those profits until it transfers the cash back the U.S. parent. Which they do not do.

Because of complex schemes like these that trigger the "deferral" loophole multinational corporations now have over $2 trillion in profits, they are keeping out of the country, away from taxes, shareholders and our economy. This represents somewhere up to $700 billion in taxes already owed to the U.S. government -- meaning owed to We the People for our infrastructure and schools and the rest.

These giant corporations are now "lobbying" for giveaways that let them just keep that money (surprise), and too many of our elected officials are cooperating.

For example, we need money to maintain our infrastructure. (We need the money because these corporations are dodging their taxes.) Some of our elected officials, in their great (corporate-bought) wisdom, are suggesting that we give these companies "incentives" to "bring back" the profits with a "tax holiday" -- meaning let them pay a much lower (or no) rate. An article in The Hill, Looming highway funding debate stirs tax fight in Senate, explains one proposal:

"Senate Democratic leaders are pushing the six-year transportation plan included in President Obama's budget, which calls for $317 billion in spending on roads and $143 billion on federal transit projects.

"They want to pay for it by requiring U.S. corporations to repatriate overseas profits at a 14 percent tax rate, which would raise $238 billion in revenue, and tax future foreign earnings at 19 percent."

See what they did there? They are not really proposing "requiring" the companies to pay a 14 percent rate, they are proposing letting them pay 14 percent instead of the 35 percent they owe. And to top it off they want future "offshore" profits to be taxed at only 19 percent instead of 35 percent -- a sure-fire way to get every company not already doing it to start inventing schemes to make it look like their profits are all made "outside of the country."

If they do this, the best business to be in will be the business of selling mailboxes in tax-haven countries. Because every company will be getting one and there won't be a penny of profit made in the U.S. ever again.

Next Page  1  |  2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Rate It | View Ratings

Dave Johnson Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Dave has more than 20 years of technology industry experience. His earlier career included technical positions, including video game design at Atari and Imagic. He was a pioneer in design and development of productivity and educational (more...)

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Three Charts To Email To Your Right-Wing Brother-In-Law

Upcoming Trans-Pacific Partnership Looks Like Corporate Takeover

Actually, "the Rich" Don't "Create Jobs," We Do

Now We Know Why Huge TPP Trade Deal Is Kept Secret From The Public

Does Clinton Really Oppose TPP? There Is A Test For That

Will TPP Kill The Post Office?

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend