Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   1 comment
OpEdNews Op Eds

Have you ever had a bronchial infection?

By       Message Ed Tubbs     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to None 6/7/11

Author 7671
Become a Fan
  (11 fans)
- Advertisement -

Have you ever had a bronchial infection? Man, can that be rough: a hacking, coughing up of greenish phlegm that only gets worse and worse. Finally you visit a doctor who prescribes Amoxicillin with the stern admonition to continue to take the entire week's worth of the antibiotic, even after you begin to feel better. "Don't want to leave a remnant of the bacteria to survive, now strengthened and immune to the medication."

"But Doc," you argue, "I don't have much money and that stuff costs a lot, and I'd have to put it on my credit card. Can't you just gimme a couple days worth?"

"Being hospitalized with pneumonia is a whole lot more expensive, and the outcome is far less certain" the physician replies.      

A severe recession can be like that: requiring a heavy dose of government intervention. The "Great Recession" we experienced in the last years of the Bush administration required, but did not get from either the Bush or the Obama administrations, an adequately heavy dose of government intervention in the form of federal economic stimulus. What we got was too weak to do much good, and for too brief a period, which is why the country continues to linger near the edge of the abyss.

Start with a few fundamentals at least most can likely agree on.

One fundamental is that it's economically better to have folks who are gainfully employed and paying taxes than it is to have folks who are unemployed, and drawing benefits from various government coffers.

One is building the pot, the other is taking from the pot. One is buying goods and services from the business community, the other is hunkering down, buying little. As the consumer pool shrinks, the businesses that would ordinarily employ workers to serve customers are now forced to lay workers off, thus further exacerbating the downward spiral. As more and more are drawing more and more from the government, and as fewer and fewer are contributing, the fewer resources a government has with which to provide those services.  

And never forget that even when no large contracts are involved, the governments at all levels are also customers for the various business communities. Their employees buy coffee on the way to their jobs, they purchase gasoline for their cars, in order to get to their jobs, they purchase lunches, and on and on and on.

- Advertisement -

The reverse also occurs when the economy is growing, rather than shrinking. And this is where the GOP has gotten it all wrong, and why the Obama administration errs grievously when it buys into the Republican orthodoxy of hunkering down; worrying more about an increase in the budget deficit and national debt than unemployment.

Save for taxation that strangles, businesses hire in order to meet current or anticipated demand. Perhaps an example will help.

Say you have a house that is badly in need of general repair and updating; a new roof, some foundation work, replacement of the water heater and furnace, and a new kitchen. You've reached agreement on price and terms with a reliable general contractor to have the work done. The general cannot do all the work himself. He's going to have to rely to a great extent on others; suppliers, sub-contractors, and their employees. If, because of the economic downturn they are presently without the requisite workers, they'll have to go out and hire them. Regardless of whatever the tax structure is, save for that strangling scenario, your demand for their services will compose the underlying demand for a workforce. Reducing their tax rate to zero will not encourage them to hire even one more person than is needed.

Essentially it's as simple and basic as that. Nor does it matter much whether the business is a mom-and-pop venture or something much (even WAY much) larger. If the demand is either present or anticipated for a product or service, the supplying business will make the investments in labor and equipment that are necessary.

With the surfeit of documenting data available, further amplification of the above, concerning the terrible and unaffordable waste wrought by them, wasn't needed by HuffPost's ""Patriotic Millionaires' Describe What They've Done With Their Bush Tax Cuts" article.

- Advertisement -

As to the profligate waste, " The tax cuts enacted in 2001 and 2003 overwhelmingly benefited the richest 1 percent of taxpayers, according to the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center, a joint project of the Brookings Institution and the Urban Institute. The progressive Center on Budget and Policy Priorities estimated in 2009 that the tax cuts "added about $1.7 trillion to deficits between 2001 and 2008.'" That's between 2001 and 2008! According to Citizens for Tax Justice president Bob McIntyre, "If they are fully extended, they will cost five-and-a-half trillion dollars over the coming decade ." (Emphasis mine)

But the article asked what the beneficiaries of the tax cuts were doing with their tax bonuses? Paul Egerman, founder of eScription, a medical transcription company, claims he's likely saved several million dollars because of the tax cuts, but that he's "not done anything with that money." He's "kept it."

Dennis Meheil, chairman of U.S. corrugated, Inc., a cardboard box company, said he "got a bigger boat." Unfortunately, the building of the 150-foot sloop didn't add a single American job, as it was built in Italy.

Next Page  1  |  2


- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

An "Old Army Vet" and liberal, qua liberal, with a passion for open inquiry in a neverending quest for truth unpoisoned by religious superstitions. Per Voltaire: "He who can lead you to believe an absurdity can lead you to commit an atrocity."

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
/* The Petition Site */
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The Texas Board of Education: America's Taliban.

Refusing The Call; Will selfish Seniors hand over the USA's future to China?

Merry Christmas-- Ho, Ho, Ho What the Hell

Today's McCarthyism. Will we Stand up Against it, or Stand Down?

ANYone who would vote for Sarah Palin is not an American

"The horror, the horror" -- Health Insurance CEOs Testify in Congress