Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   40 comments
General News

Hark The Angel Speaks: Obama Explains War To Nation Tonight

By       Message Danny Schechter     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 3 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Supported 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H2 3/28/11

- Advertisement -

HARK, THE ANGEL SPEAKS ON YOUR TV: Barack Obama To Explain The Libryan Intervention Tonight

By Danny Schechter, Author of the Crime Of Our Time

President Obama is slated to give a big speech to the Nation tonight celebrating the great Libyan offensive.

As you may recall, the President already has cast the mission solely in humanitarian terms on his Saturday radio show, as the LA Times reported:

"President Obama said Saturday that he sent U.S. warplanes into Libya a week ago to avert a 'humanitarian catastrophe' and a 'blood bath', and he denied that the U.S. is being drawn into a wider war there.

"The United States should not -- and cannot -- intervene every time there's a crisis somewhere in the world," the president said in his Saturday radio address. "But I firmly believe that when innocent people are being brutalized, when someone like [Moammar] Gaddafi threatens a blood bath that could destabilize an entire region, and when the international community is prepared to come together to save many thousands of lives, then it's in our national interest to act. And it's our responsibility. This is one of those times."

As his advisors huddled to turn these comments into TV special, they realized they have to try to pacify Republicans who accuse him of bypassing Congress   and liberal Dems who are upset with the two wars he is commanding and chiefing   and don't want a third. Its hard for them to put in the context of the "DUTY TO PROTECT" when so many people in protest around the world are going unprotected."

Recall that the this war came along at an opportune time for Washington, just after the Egyptian people kicked Mubarak out and a wave of pro-democracy sentiment challenged leaders we have long supported, in Yemen, In Bahrain,

- Advertisement -

 The American people were beginning to develop a glow of solidarity with people who we have been long taught to hate, fear, and ignore. Thanks to the media attention--on TV and in social media--we admired their courage and felt a connection.

Suddenly, Washington was on the defensive for less than stellar and timely support for Egyptian aspirations and, before that, Tunisia, Our policicy gobbledygook about stability uber alles was being seen as a not so thinly veiled form of support for an oppressive status quo.

How to bounce back, seize the initiative, show how concerned we truly are for the people of the Middle East?   

That's been hard to do also because of our back pedaling on justice for the Palestinians and actually voting against A UN resolution denouncing settlements, a policy we ourselves had espoused, as just about put the final kaboosh on the peace process. (Prensa Latina reports: At least 17 Palestinians, including   children, were injured in five Israeli air strikes on Gaza, considered   the fiercest of recent weeks, medical and resistance sources reported   Tuesday.)

What a great time for Gadaffi to surface at the top of the news agenda, as the Arab leader everyone can all love to hate, as the person we can demonize and wage war upon,  all in the name of  "our values," of saving civilians even if many of these civilians are an armed force that no doubt have been covertly supported by intelligence agencies. His brutality, well reported by many media outlets, lends credibility to the NATO operation. No doubt, he is his own worst enemy, hardly a sympathetic victim. We still don't have a figure on civililian casualties. Do you really believe there have been none?

- Advertisement -

Since the UN resolution is drenched in humanitarianism as the rationale for the no-fly zone, we can't openly set out to topple the colonel or bump him off as the excreable John Bolton suggests, so we speak from all sides of our mouths.

We are letting the mysterious no-name "Rebels" do our work for us. The New York Time reports this morning; "There were unconfirmed reports early Monday that rebel forces had routed pro-government defenders in Col. Muammar el-Qaddafi's tribal homeland of Surt."

The Washington Post reports that Tipoli is under heavy bombardment today-so many days of bombardment in the name of a non-fly zone?

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

 

- Advertisement -

Supported 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

News Dissector Danny Schechter is blogger in chief at Mediachannel.Org He is the author of PLUNDER: Investigating Our Economic Calamity (Cosimo Books) available at Amazon.com. See Newsdisssector.org/store.htm.

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon



Go To Commenting
/* The Petition Site */
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Israel Gives All Jews A Bad Name

Is There A Threat of Fascism in the USA?

Free Marketers Going After Occupy Wall Street --Danny Schechter

COG OR COA: WHY IS OBAMA MORPHING INTO BUSH 2?

WHO OWNS OUR MEDIA AND WHY IT MATTERS

WERE THE BANKS TOO BIG TO FAIL OR THE BANKERS TOO BIG TO JAIL?