265 online
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 21 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Exclusive to OpEd News:
OpEdNews Op Eds   

Buyer's Remorse, Economic Collapse, Oligarchs, and War

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages)   16 comments
Message Cynthia McKinney
Become a Fan
  (33 fans)


First of all, I'd like to announce that I'll be on http://www.wpfw.org radio in the morning at 7:00 on Hodari's show.  I'll be on live from Haiti.  I hope those of you who can will tune in.

Of late, I'm been approached by four types of voters:  one voter type knew about our Power to the People campaign and enthusiastically supported it.  They find themselves in the position of not wanting to say, "I told you so" too loudly, but certainly say it among themselves and to each other.

Increasingly, though, there's another type of voter that is contacting me, expressing "Buyer's Remorse" for having supported candidate Barack Obama.  These voters can be futher subdivided into three categories:  those who voted for Obama, not knowing very much about our Power to the People campaign; those who voted for Obama, knowing a lot about Rosa, me, and the Power to the People campaign, but who chose instead to vote for Obama out of fear of a McCain/Palin White House; and finally, those who knew about our Power to the People campaign and were hostile to it because they were suspicious that our campaign was designed to deny the White House to candidate Obama--the spoiler campaign.  Fortunately and hopefully, because of the integrity with which we ran our campaign, those in this latter category are few in terms of their numbers in communication with me.

(Image by Unknown Owner)   Details   DMCA

For me, the number of people contacting me expressing regret for having voted for Obama is a double-edged sword.  That is, it indicates that prior to the election, we were not able to seal the deal with a significant number of our natural voters.  There are many reasons for that, but being severely underfunded lies at the base of that failing.  However, on the other hand, these expressions of "buyer's remorse" indicate that people knowingly allowed themselves to be swept into the voting booth and vote against their values.

I am happy that more and more people are freely expressing their support for the platform of the Power to the People campaign.  I am extremely happy that more and more people express their interest in supporting me in another political endeavor, be it another Congressional or White House run.  I am particularly pleased that people are willing to explore the possibilities that politics outside the box of two-party conformity can provide.  But I have to admit that I am saddened by the fact that so many people fail to understand that in the transaction of a political election, there is no warranty for "buyer's remorse."  The crescendo of well-financed political propaganda is all geared toward achieving the desired result on election day and there is no denouement.  The desired result is to have as many voters as possible stay within the political confines of either of the two special interest parties because their candidates have already been vetted and have agreed to certain restrictions in the area of public policy.  That's why our Power to the People campaign was the only one talking about instituting full employment and a living wage, subsidizing education through college so that students would not have to take out loans to go to college, creating green jobs (like solar panel manufacture) in neighborhoods blighted by abandoned big box buildings, having former Comptroller of the U.S. David Walker perform audits of the companies that got bailout money, nationalizing the Federal Reserve, creating publicly owned neighborhood banks, thereby finally creating an economy that worked for the people instead of the special interests.  And shutting down the military-industrial complex's Empire America.

Our agenda provided a clear route to an end to torture, rendition for torture, warrantless wiretapping, spying on U.S. citizen activists, and an end to war.  Not just an end to the war on terror, but a clear end to war and occupation.  And now that the Obama Administration has used its Justice Department to argue in court in favor of those who ordered torture, and to defend Bush Administration policies of torture, rendition, warrantless wiretapping, and extra-legal treatment of so-called "enemy combatants," most of whom have committed no crime (like six-year Guantanamo Prisoner number 345, Sami El-Hajj, who was on the  Dignity with me as I tried to make it to Gaza).  On these issues, the Obama Administration is consonant with the Bush Administration.  No wonder Bush et al have more to worry about from the "small-d" democrats in Spain than from the "big-D" Democrats in Washington, DC.

And so the beat goes on.  Until four years from now at the climax of when the electorate will be beaten, once again, into submission if they dare raise their head to support a candidate from a political party that has not been bought off by the special interests.  The people are continually asked to decrease the volume of the discordant notes in their political hearts in order to prevent a worse outcome.  But what could be worse than suppressing one's own acknowledgement of the existing political cacophony in order to facilitate the interests of others, especially when the others whose interests are always accommodated are in contradiction to your own interests and the planet's?  But every four years, the masters of the political process are able to convince more and more people to do this.  And then when people see that what they wanted and even worse, thought they were voting for, is slow in coming, "buyer's remorse" begins to set in.  Some will wait an entire four years hoping that the powers that be will eventually get around to supporting the voters' interests.  Only in the end to be let down again--but only after they've once again given their most precious asset, their vote, to the special interest political parties who will betray them yet again.  It's like a dance, where one of the dance partners always gets her toes stepped on.  It's more like a stomping, actually.  Others have likened it to a situation of domestic violence, where the abused partner keeps coming back for more.

I am happy to receive these messages because it indicates that we are gaining  new supporters.  But I am saddened at the same time because it demonstrates how difficult our task really is.  It's not just about being right.  It's also about winning.  And the stakes are so high on this one that we have to win.  But in order for our values to win, we will need everyone's help to turn this ship of state around.  The enormity of the task of actually taking our country back is becoming clear.

And with what is happening economically, it is likely to be even more difficult.  As someone who studied Russian literature and the great Russian authors, like Pushkin, Chechov, Dostoyevsky, and others, I have always paid attention to events taking place in Russia.  I watched with interest the creation of a superclass of dual-passport carrying individuals who stripped Russia of its patrimony and became known as the oligarchs.  According to the Guardian, Russia's seven original oligarchs came to control 50% of Russia's economy during the 1990s.

I came to realize that the very individuals entrusted with correcting the current economic woes are, in actuality, its very authors in Russia.  And so, the question I asked myself was this:  "Is the US next in line?  And after the debris is cleared, or the dust settles, as they say, will our country also be left with oligarchs, who will own everything?"  If so, does that make Barack Obama the U.S. equivalent of Mikhail Gorbachev who put in place the policies that allowed the oligarchs to get their start?  In fact, right after the US election that sent President Obama to the White House, former Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev said that Obama should usher in "perestroika" reforms in the U.S.

When I was in London recently for the Malaysia conference, I met a gentleman who completed the answer for me.  Economist Michael Hudson and lawyer and author Ellen Brown had confirmed my worst fears, but Mr. David Pidcock really brought them all home for me.  And the short answer to the question I put to him is, "Yes, the U.S. economy is being hollowed out with our own money, not for the benefit of the American people, but for the benefit of a few and yes, President Obama has enabled the very characters who have successfully implemented this result elsewhere."

In the next few essays, I will explain as others are doing as well, what is going on in plain speak.  The obligation of voters to educate themselves will be far more difficult if there is far less truth in plain speak out there for them to read.  I will try my best to combine my research and experiences with the findings of trusted experts and share them with you in plain speak.  (I am trying to get better as I've been told that I need to make my plain speak a little plainer.  Folks sometimes have to get dictionaries to read and understand me.  Sorry about that.  I hope this essay is a bit better.)

Finally, David Pidcock, my London friend, reminds us in "Money:  A Christian View," that a socially healthy economy achieves the highest possible standard of living for all and achieves the "elimination of insecurity and fear and consequent selfish materialist values, so that the individual human being may be enabled to live with dignity and self-respect."

That's what we're trying to build here, a government that respects and promotes and protects human dignity.  That is not being done today, sadly.  Over the next few essays I would like to discuss how we get from here to there and how President Obama's economic team is deviating from the "there" that we all want.

Next Page  1  |  2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Must Read 5   Well Said 4   News 2  
Rate It | View Ratings

Cynthia McKinney Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Cynthia Ann McKinney (born March 17, 1955) is a former United States Representative and the 2008 Green Party nominee for President of the United States. McKinney served as a Democrat in the U.S. House of Representatives from 1993-2003 and 2005-2007, (more...)
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

From Cynthia McKinney: On President Obama and Libya; Japan and 9/11 Truth

Ruminations on President Obama's Tenure Thus Far and "Acceptable Punditry"

Cynthia McKinney's Report from the FORUM FOR PALESTINE in Malaysia

The Economy, From Soros and Greenspan to Napoleon's Waterloo, And a Tip of the Hat to Haiti, Too

Chris Dorner: "The enemy combatants in LA are not the citizens and suspects, it's the police officers."

Cynthia McKinney and the Spirit of Humanity Crew are captured and detained by the Israel Navy

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend