Power of Story Send a Tweet        
- Advertisement -

Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 3 (3 Shares)  

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   1 comment
OpEdNews Op Eds

Folly Beach

By       Message Karl Grossman       (Page 1 of 2 pages)     Permalink

Related Topic(s): ; , Add Tags  Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Author 14729
- Advertisement -

Folly Beach. Yes, there really is such a place. It's a poster child for the folly of dumping sand on the shoreline in the expensive and fruitless attempt to try to hold back the ocean and protect beach houses.

In the Long Island, New York village of Quogue, Concerned Citizens of Quogue have included a current article about this beach in South Carolina in their current online newsletter (http://ccquogue.org/) and the group asks the question: "Quogue's Own 'Folly' Beach?"

Happening in Quogue is a conflict emblematic of the struggle involving the coast that's been going on for decades on Long Island, heightened by the impacts of Superstorm Sandy. There's a proposal for $14 million in taxpayer-funded sand dumping along the Quogue shoreline.

Meanwhile, down south comes this news on the Concerned Citizens website.

- Advertisement -

"Folly Beach--Huge waves kicked up by Friday's storm scoured and swept away newly poured sands on the east end of this island," begins the article from The Post and Courier of South Carolina published last month.

And it wasn't an encore of Sandy that did it, just another blow.

The cost to Folly Beach: some $30 million in dumped sand--gone with the sea.

- Advertisement -

"In little more than a month," The Post and Courier says, Folly Beach homeowners "have lost much of the sand" dumped just a month earlier on the shore fronting their places.

Some $30 million in sand placed on the Folly Beach shoreline. A month later, it's all gone.

The newspaper quoted the manager of the Army Corps of Engineers' Folly Beach project as saying that placing sand on the shore "doesn't stop erosion. It protects properties. We put the required amount of sand out there. The sand didn't hold up."

And this was not the first time in recent years that loads of sand have been dumped on Folly Beach. It has been done again and again, at huge taxpayer cost. "The last time the work was done, in 2005, the cost was $12 million," about "a third of the current cost," notes The Post and Courier.

This rise in price for coastal sand-dumping is "mirroring the soaring cost of beach nourishment across the country," comments Concerns Citizens of Quogue.

The organization in its current newsletter also brings attention to a letter from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) that summarizes comments it has received on the $14 million plan to dump 1.1 million cubic yards of sand on the Quogue oceanfront.

- Advertisement -

The comments are right on the mark and include:

  • "The relatively few homeowners affected by beach erosion in Quogue should consider relocating their homes landward."

  • "All village taxpayers should not have to pay for a project which will directly benefit a relative few."

    Next Page  1  |  2

 

- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Karl Grossman is a professor of journalism at the State University of New York/College at Old Westbury and host of the nationally syndicated TV program Enviro Close-Up.

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon Share Author on Social Media   Go To Commenting

The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Related Topic(s): ; , Add Tags
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

New Book Concludes: Chernobyl death toll: 985,000, mostly from cancer

Siemens' Abandoning Nuclear Power

Murdoch Media Empire: A Journalistic Travesty

Fukushima: A Month of Media Disinformation

What Could Truly End the Space Program: A Nuclear Disaster Overhead

The Cancer Epidemic: Its Environmental Causes