Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 17 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H2'ed 11/29/15

Finally..... At long last, without further ado: Feds will track police shootings.

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages)   3 comments
Message Daily Kos

Reprinted from by xxdr zombiexx

Ferguson Protest, NYC 25th Nov 2014
Ferguson Protest, NYC 25th Nov 2014
(Image by The All-Nite Images)
  Details   DMCA

Pull the wagons in a circle, boys, they're gonna start collectin' data!
Hundreds of Deaths Later, the Feds Will Finally Start Tracking Police Shootings

In separate announcements, the FBI and the Department of Justice say they'll create programs to monitor police-involved shootings at the federal level. Law enforcement agencies are tasked with tallying their own officer-involved shootings, but after the officer-involved death of 18-year-old Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri, it came to light that no government agency maintains a complete database of the national numbers.

On Wednesday, FBI Director James B. Comey called it "embarrassing" and "ridiculous" that up until very recently, officials had made no concerted effort to track the sort of violence that has inspired national protests and the rise of the Black Lives Matter movement.

-- -- -- -- --

On Monday, U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch made a similar declaration, saying the Department of Justice will create an open-source system that will track the number of people killed by police and incorporate data on nonfatal shootings, civilian deaths while in police custody, and use of force by law enforcement. Calling the data "vital," she said the absence of a consistent set of standards "makes it hard to see these trends, and that's why it is so important to focus on these [numbers]."

Better late than never.

Of course I applaud this but let's see how this pans out. There are apparently stylistic differences in the approach to counting when cops use too much force to do their job.

In the absence of reliable government statistics, journalists have picked up the slack by launching their own public Internet databases to track deadly shootings and even provide geographic and demographic context about each of the people killed. Still, there are discrepancies among the databases. The Washington Post puts the number of people fatally shot by police this year at 759; The Guardian puts the number at 891.

We should have been tracking this decades ago, like we need to have been tracking gun deaths and such, but 'some' don't want us to have hard data because information is power and they like things like they are RIGHT NOW.

I cannot wait to see what comes out of this.

Valuable 2   Must Read 1   Well Said 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Daily Kos Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

articles reprinted from

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Just Read FBI Deputy Director McCabe's Statement Regarding His Firing By Trump... Just Read It.

Rush Limbaugh's Sponsor List

Comcast favors Fox News, charges $204 more for MSNBC package. ACTION NEEDED

A Christmas Present From Hucky Boo Boo Sanders, She's Leaving WH The End Of The Year

Ron Paul takes lead In Iowa, Newt Gingrich falls off cliff

Republican Bill Bans Non-Church Marriages

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend