Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   No comments
OpEdNews Op Eds

Expanding Draconian Computer Fraud and Abuse Act Powers

By       Message Stephen Lendman     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 4 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H4 4/2/13

Author 194
Become a Fan
  (191 fans)
- Advertisement -

Expanding Draconian Computer Fraud and Abuse Act Powers

by Stephen Lendman

- Advertisement -

CFAA destroys personal freedoms.

A previous article discussed CFAA. It explained the following:

It's an anti-hacking law. It's a computer trespass law. It criminalizes accessing computer systems "without authorization." 

"(E)xceeds authorized access" terminology was left undefined.

- Advertisement -

In 1984, it was enacted. It was amended numerous times. It's primarily a criminal law. It covers seven types of offenses.

They include obtaining national security information, compromising confidentiality, trespassing in a government computer, accessing a system to defraud and/or obtain value, damaging a computer or information therein, trafficking in passwords, and threatening to damage a computer.

A 1994 amendment permits civil actions. In 2001, Patriot Act provisions addressed computer crime. They require Internet service providers to report suspicious information or activity "without delay."

Disproportionately harsh penalties harm innocent victims. CFAA was misused against Aaron Swartz. He was maliciously targeted.

The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) discussed congressional efforts to toughen CFAA. Law Professor Tim Wu was cited. His New Yorker article called it "the worst law in technology."

"Congress could change" it, he said, "but everyone knows that waiting for congressional action nowadays is a fool's game."

CFAA "is the most outrageous criminal law you've never heard of."

- Advertisement -

Law Professor Orin Kerr's a former Justice Department attorney. He's a leading computer criminal law scholar. He calls CFAA unconstitutionally vague. 

No one knows what "unauthorized access" means, he says. Prosecutors can put "any Internet user they want" in prison. CFAA is "egregiously overbroad." It's "a nightmare for a country that calls itself free."

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4


- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

I was born in 1934, am a retired, progressive small businessman concerned about all the major national and world issues, committed to speak out and write about them.

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
/* The Petition Site */
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The McCain-Lieberman Police State Act

Daniel Estulin's "True Story of the Bilderberg Group" and What They May Be Planning Now

Continuity of Government: Coup d'Etat Authority in America

America Facing Depression and Bankruptcy

Lies, Damn Lies and the Murdoch Empire

Mandatory Swine Flu Vaccine Alert