Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter 1 Share on LinkedIn Share on Reddit Tell A Friend Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites
OpEdNews Op Eds

Enormous, Humongous $36.4 September Trade Deficit Helps Trump

By   Follow Me on Twitter     Message Dave Johnson       (Page 1 of 1 pages)     Permalink    (# of views)   No comments

Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H3 11/4/16

Author 4387
Become a Fan
  (12 fans)

From Our Future

Lack of Jobs is Due to Our Trade Deficit
Lack of Jobs is Due to Our Trade Deficit
(Image by
  Permission   Details   DMCA
- Advertisement -

The U.S. Census Bureau reported Friday that the September trade deficit fell to an enormous, humgonous $36.4 billion, down $4.0 billion from -- and even more enormous and humongous -- $40.5 billion in August.

This does not represent a boom in job (and wealth)-creating exports. Exports were up only 0.6 percent because a "strong dollar" means less worldwide demand for US exports. Imports were down 13 percent, and the big drop in imports likely represents a slowdown in US consumer spending.

In normal times a trade deficit of $36.4 billion in a single month would be met with outrage, headlines, speeches, torches and pitchforks. It represents a transfer of fulfillment of our economy's "demand" out of the country at a time when we need jobs here. A trade deficit means factories close here, workers are laid off, they open "there," the same goods come back to our country. But it is called "trade" because now the goods cross a border. And it is a trade deficit because more goods are coming in than are going out. Our economy has to borrow to make up the difference.

- Advertisement -

In these abnormal times we're only getting the torches and pitchforks -- also known as Trump voters, pissed off that their middle-class jobs have been replaced by low-paying jobs. The US has had a trade deficit since the late 1970s, when we were sold on "free trade" and "free markets" that benefit the 1% at the expense of the rest of us. Our economy has had to borrow every single year since then to make up that difference.

Throughout history ongoing unemployment, falling wages and economic despair opens people up to Trump's brand of racist, xenophobic scapegoating appeal. And here we are.

In a time of full employment with jobs available everywhere and employers begging for employees, outsourcing production would be a good thing for the American economy and foreign workers. Companies are able to meet demand and the public is able to have their wants and needs satisfied. But since the late 1970s America's policies have been rigged against full employment, in order to break the power of workers, create falling wages and strengthen political control by plutocrats. Trade deficits are part of that formulation.

- Advertisement -


- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

Dave has more than 20 years of technology industry experience. His earlier career included technical positions, including video game design at Atari and Imagic. He was a pioneer in design and development of productivity and educational (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon Share Author on Social Media   Go To Commenting

The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Three Charts To Email To Your Right-Wing Brother-In-Law

Upcoming Trans-Pacific Partnership Looks Like Corporate Takeover

Actually, "the Rich" Don't "Create Jobs," We Do

Now We Know Why Huge TPP Trade Deal Is Kept Secret From The Public

Does Clinton Really Oppose TPP? There Is A Test For That

Will TPP Kill The Post Office?