Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 13 (13 Shares)  

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   1 comment
OpEdNews Op Eds

End California's Judicial Corruption Now; Stop 2015-16 Illegal Budget Payments to Judges!

By       Message Richard Fine     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

Funny 1   Supported 1   Valuable 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Author 502599
From flickr.com/photos/86530412@N02/8213432552/: End illegal payments to judges.
End illegal payments to judges.
(Image by StockMonkeys.com)
  Permission   Details   DMCA

Unless we act, approximately thirty California counties and courts will pay "local judicial benefits" in addition to state compensation, to approximately 90% of 1,800 Superior Court judges in their 2015-2016 Budgets commencing July 1, 2105. The largest, by judges, are LA, San Diego, Orange, Santa Clara, Sacramento and San Francisco. See http://www.campaignforjudicialintegrity.org for all counties and courts.

In 2008, these payments were held to violate California Constitution Article 6, Section 19 in Sturgeon v. LA County. At the judges urging, in 2009, California enacted SBX 2 11, effective 5/20/2009. SBX 2 11, Section 5 gave the judges, who took the payments, and the governments and government employees, who gave the payments to the judges, retroactive immunity from California criminal prosecution, civil liability and disciplinary action. SBX 2 11 Section 2 allowed the payments to continue to judges currently in office as of 7/1/2008, without immunity. The last term ended January, 2013.

California criminal codes violated were: (1) Penal Code Section 96.5 -- judge acting with knowledge of perverting and obstructing justice; (2) Penal Code Section 182 (a) (5) -- judges and the governments and government employees conspiracy to pervert and obstruct justice, amongst others. Additionally, the judges were required to disqualify themselves from any case in which the county was a party, a witness or had an interest under California Code of Civil Procedure Section 170.1 (a) (6) (A) (3) and Code of Judicial Ethics, Canons 1, 2 A and 3E (1) and disclose the payments under Canon 3 E (2). Few, if any did. The payments also violated 18 U.S.C. Section 1346- the intangible right to honest services, as payments to a judge from a party are a bribe. There was no immunity from federal prosecution.

The payments corrupted criminal cases prosecuted by a county district attorney, family law cases where the county participated, eminent domain cases, traffic cases and any case involving or affecting the county.

The 2015 payments will be approximately $25-30 million. Over the years, the payments were approximately $400 million. We can end judicial corruption now by demanding the county supervisors and local courts remove the illegal payments from the 2015-2016 budgets!

 

- Advertisement -

Funny 1   Supported 1   Valuable 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

Richard I. Fine, Ph.D., Consul General Kingdom of Norway Retired (1995-2010), Principal, Richard I. Fine & Assoc.; Strategic Consultant; Mediator; Chmn. Campaign for Judicial Integrity; Co Chmn. Judicial Reform Comm. DivorceCorp; website: (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon



Go To Commenting
/* The Petition Site */
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

End California's Judicial Corruption Now; Stop 2015-16 Illegal Budget Payments to Judges!

California's Judicial Council Must Bar Judges from Taking Payments from Counties or Local Courts