Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 16 Share on Twitter 1 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H2'ed 11/23/16

Election Data Screams Fraud - Cui Bono?

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages)   No comments
Become a Premium Member Would you like to know how many people have read this article? Or how reputable the author is? Simply sign up for a Advocate premium membership and you'll automatically see this data on every article. Plus a lot more, too.
Author 83299
Message Larry Dorshkind

Whose Fingerprint?
Whose Fingerprint?
(Image by icons8)
  Details   DMCA
Eric Draitser's article "Election Data Screams Fraud"( does indeed scream out at you. Of course, the article does not answer "cui bono". Perhaps some sleuths can develop a list of candidates. To inform you of the article and assist potential sleuths, here are excerpts from the article:


According to the exit-poll data compiled from 28 states where data was available, nearly every single race where there was a discrepancy between exit-poll and final-vote data went to Trump.

Especially noteworthy are the following states: Ohio (8.5 percent discrepancy), North Carolina (5.9 percent discrepancy), Pennsylvania (5.6 percent discrepancy), Wisconsin (4.9 percent discrepancy), Florida (2.6 percent discrepancy). In these states, each of which was considered essential for Trump to win the election, the discrepancies between exit-poll data and final counts were enough to flip the state to Trump. In other words, had the final results roughly approximated the exit-poll data, Clinton would have won each of these states (Ohio was essentially tied). Put simply, the variance in the final counts gave the election to Trump.

The results in Ohio, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Florida are well beyond the margin of error.

As attorney and professor of political science, Bob Fitrakis, astutely noted in an interview with CounterPunch Radio, "If this election occurred outside the United States, our government would not recognize it as legitimate."

In an interview after the New York primaries (they too showed a statistically improbable discrepancy in exit polls versus final-vote counts in favor of Hillary Clinton against Bernie Sanders) ...

Had the Democratic primaries not been rigged in favor of Hillary Clinton, Bernie Sanders would have been the nominee, and in all likelihood, President of the United States.

Trump is a fraud, as was Clinton.


Must Read 3   Well Said 1   Supported 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Larry Dorshkind Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Larry Dorshkind is a retired architect. One of his projects was "Renovation of Infectious Diseases Laboratory" for the State of California's Department of Health. Another project was to design the nation's first purpose-designed Electron (more...)

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Ukraine, Russia, MH17, WWIII (My "Cliff Notes")

Neocons are Responsible for the Dazed Boy in the Ambulance

MSM Propaganda to Accept War with Russia Now Underway

Election Data Screams Fraud - Cui Bono?

How to Steal an Election (Again)

The Concept of Policing During Protests is Bass Akwards

To View Comments or Join the Conversation: