Power of Story Send a Tweet        
- Advertisement -

Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter 1 Share on Facebook 1 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 1 (3 Shares)  

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   No comments
OpEdNews Op Eds

Election Data Screams Fraud - Cui Bono?

By       Message Larry Dorshkind       (Page 1 of 1 pages)     Permalink

Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 3   Well Said 1   Supported 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H2 11/23/16

Author 83299

Whose Fingerprint?
Whose Fingerprint?
(Image by icons8)
  Permission   Details   DMCA
- Advertisement -
Eric Draitser's article "Election Data Screams Fraud"(http://www.counterpunch.org/2016/11/22/election-data-screams-fraud/) does indeed scream out at you. Of course, the article does not answer "cui bono". Perhaps some sleuths can develop a list of candidates. To inform you of the article and assist potential sleuths, here are excerpts from the article:

Excerpts:

According to the exit-poll data compiled from 28 states where data was available, nearly every single race where there was a discrepancy between exit-poll and final-vote data went to Trump.

Especially noteworthy are the following states: Ohio (8.5 percent discrepancy), North Carolina (5.9 percent discrepancy), Pennsylvania (5.6 percent discrepancy), Wisconsin (4.9 percent discrepancy), Florida (2.6 percent discrepancy). In these states, each of which was considered essential for Trump to win the election, the discrepancies between exit-poll data and final counts were enough to flip the state to Trump. In other words, had the final results roughly approximated the exit-poll data, Clinton would have won each of these states (Ohio was essentially tied). Put simply, the variance in the final counts gave the election to Trump.

The results in Ohio, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Florida are well beyond the margin of error.

- Advertisement -

As attorney and professor of political science, Bob Fitrakis, astutely noted in an interview with CounterPunch Radio, "If this election occurred outside the United States, our government would not recognize it as legitimate."

In an interview after the New York primaries (they too showed a statistically improbable discrepancy in exit polls versus final-vote counts in favor of Hillary Clinton against Bernie Sanders) ...

Had the Democratic primaries not been rigged in favor of Hillary Clinton, Bernie Sanders would have been the nominee, and in all likelihood, President of the United States.

- Advertisement -

Trump is a fraud, as was Clinton.

 

- Advertisement -

Must Read 3   Well Said 1   Supported 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Larry Dorshkind is a retired architect who specialized in space planning technologically complex projects. He graduated from UC Berkeley and, while going to college, served as a reservist in the USN submarine force (where he received his (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon Share Author on Social Media   Go To Commenting

The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Ukraine, Russia, MH17, WWIII (My "Cliff Notes")

Neocons are Responsible for the Dazed Boy in the Ambulance

How to Steal an Election (Again)

Election Data Screams Fraud - Cui Bono?

MSM Propaganda to Accept War with Russia Now Underway

Taking Grandma to the Curb (Letter to President Obama)