Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 8 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H3'ed 4/29/16

Donald Trump's foreign policy speech shows: we have no anti-war candidates

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages)   5 comments
Message Trevor Timm
Become a Fan
  (2 fans)

Reprinted from The Guardian

Hillary Clinton tends to be in favor of military engagement, and Donald Trump's speech expresses parallel sentiments

Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton
Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton
(Image by YouTube, Channel: Fox News)
  Details   DMCA

Now that it's increasingly likely that Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton will be the two major candidates for president in the general election, voters are once again left without a true anti-war candidate, or even a decisive break from the last decade-and-a-half of disastrous foreign policy.

We already know there's barely ever been a military engagement that Clinton didn't like. And Trump confirmed on Wednesday in his "big" foreign policy speech that he will be a chaotic and unpredictable aggressor whose opinion changes with the wind. When Bernie Sanders leaves the race, there will no longer be a credible voice saying that more bombing is not necessarily the answer to solving all the problems in the Middle East, many of which were caused by bombing in the first place.

Trump started off his speech on Wednesday by reading from a teleprompter in a rambling and incoherent manner, declaring that Obama has "depleted" our military (false), the Iran deal was the "worst agreement" (why?) and that we don't support Israel, "a force for justice and peace" (absurd) -- hallmark Republican conventional wisdom talking points.

He then did say some things that suggested he would not look to immediately start new wars in the Middle East and elsewhere, but it's hard to take anything he says on the subject seriously. He swung wildly from one position to its opposite on multiple occasions, contradicting himself at various times from comments he made years to mere minutes prior.

For example, he said that bombing Libya was "a disaster," but he then questioned why we aren't still bombing Libya right now. He claimed that "unlike other candidates for the presidency, war and aggression will not be my first instinct." Yet he's bragged in the recent past about wanting to bring back waterboarding, or "much worse," killing terrorists' entire families, and would not be opposed to using nuclear bombs, even in Europe. He remarked that there's "too much destruction out there -- too many destructive weapons," but just five minutes earlier in the speech, he said the US's nuclear arsenal was in dire need of "renewal."

Click Here to Read Whole Article

Rate It | View Ratings

Trevor Timm Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Trevor Timm is a co-founder and the executive director of the Freedom of the Press Foundation. He is a writer, activist, and lawyer who specializes in free speech and government transparency issues. He has contributed to  The (more...)

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Sen. Dianne Feinstein's New NSA Bill Will Codify and Extend Mass Surveillance of Americans

Everyone loves Bernie Sanders. Except, it seems, the Democratic party

DOJ Investigation of AP Part of Larger Pattern to Intimidate Sources and Reporters

If Trump leaks are OK and Clinton leaks aren't, there's a problem

Why the Panama Papers should be a US election issue

One good thing about Donald Trump's campaign: it's ruining Jeb Bush's

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend