Power of Story Send a Tweet        
- Advertisement -

Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 5 (5 Shares)  

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   4 comments
OpEdNews Op Eds

Do protest marches and rallies do much good? What are the alternatives?

By   Follow Me on Twitter     Message Don Smith       (Page 1 of 3 pages)     Permalink

Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...)  Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H3 9/21/09

Become a Fan
  (23 fans)
- Advertisement -
Progressives love going to rallies and protest marches.

There are rallies and marches about health care reform, war, torture, gay rights, abortion rights, and so on.

But are rallies and marches of much use?

They're sort of fun. They make you feel like you're part of a movement. They cathartic. In solidarity with your comrades, you get to thumb your nose at the corrupt enemy.

- Advertisement -
But the news media typically don't bother covering them. Or if they do cover them, they often give equal or greater coverage to the counter-rally.

For example, on Sept 4, 2009, there was a rally for health care reform, in honor of Ted Kennedy, in Seattle at Westlake Park. Organizers included Congressman Jim McDermott, Organizing for America, Health Care for America NOW, SEIU, UFCW 21, the Washington State Labor Council, WashPIRG, and Planned Parenthood Votes. About three thousand people participated. Yet as reported here in this article in the Huffington Post, the rally was pretty much ignored by the mainstream news media. The Seattle Times gave no coverage. A google search turns up very little about the rally. Seattle Weekly covered it in their blog. Interestingly, a bing search on the same query (rally "healh care" "westlake park" seattle september) turns up several pages of hits, almost all of them on progressive, alternative blogs and websites.

I recall a pro-choice rally in D.C. attended by hundreds of thousands of people. I remember that the front-page coverage in my local newspaper showed an anti-abortion protester in the foreground standing with her sign as the pro-choice protesters marched behind her.

- Advertisement -
Another example. A couple of years ago President Bush came to my hometown for a fundraiser for our Republican congressman, Dave Reichert. There were several thousand protesters (including a bunch of scary-looking anarchists who made the rest of us look bad). There were also a few dozen counter-protesters. While at the rally, I saw several journalists interviewing counter-protesters. The local newspapers gave equal coverage to the counter-protesters, and in fact, most of the newspaper coverage, in both local newspapers, consisted of photos of the President getting off the plane, shaking hands with the congressmen, etc.

I spoke with a reporter at one of the newspapers. He said that the photography department decided that the President's photos would generate the most reader interest. It was a business decision.

A couple of weeks ago I participated in a raly on Mercer Island. The local Mercer Island newspaper showed a photo ONLY of the counter-rally and ignored the violent incident, as reported here and here.

I asked reporters about this issue of news coverage of rallies and protests. One reporter said that most rallies simply aren't newsworthy. It's not news when progressives protest against war, or when Catholics protest against abortion. Only if rallies are massive (like hundreds of thousands of people), or violent, do they get coverage. If it bleeds, it leads.

I'm getting invitation s to another health care rally in Seattle, this one organized by MoveOn.org, the state Health Care for America NOW! coalition, and Fuse Washington. It says the rally will be "massive". Should I go?

Nowadays even conservatives have their rallies and protests and tea parties. On the other hand, the conservatives' rallies tend to get a lot of publicity and coverage by FOX News.

- Advertisement -
As discussed here, protests might work better if they had the backing of religious leaders, the way civil rights protests in the 1960s had support of leaders like Rev. Martin Luther King.

Why haven't there been any benefit concerts by popular singers and musicians for health care reform?

It seems to me that progressives need to spend a LOT more time building relationships with reporters from the mainstream press. Like it or not, we're dependent on them for coverage.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3


- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It


DFA organizer, Democratic Precinct Committee Officer, writer, and programmer. My op-ed pieces have appeared in the Seattle Times, the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, and elsewhere. See http://WALiberals.org and http://TruthSite.org for my writing, my (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon Share Author on Social Media   Go To Commenting

The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The myth that the Dems are as bad as the Repugs

Why Abortion Isn't Murder

Image essay about blood soaked NRA

Government is like a computer's operating system: a response to libertarians

Failure to prosecute: why Obama is having trouble passing health care reform

Undividing the Left: Hard-core and Soft-core progressives