Reprinted from Greanville Post
Netanyahu glaring at UNO audience. The man is nothing if not shamelessly audacious.
(Image by UN Webcast) Details DMCA
He offers no alternatives, of course. There are three reasons for that. A) There is none. B) The other members of the "5+1" negotiating group have made it clear that they would not go back to the negotiating table in any case, even if Iran were wiling (which they are not). C) The last thing Israel wants is for the deal to be in place, and work. That would give one major reason for a) cutting back on the Israeli military-industrial complex (yes, folks, they have one too), and b) it would weaken Likud politically by diminishing the "threat of Iran."
By the way, the Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has said that Israel will be wiped off the face of the Earth in 25 years. BUT, he never said that Iran would do the wiping. Read the statement, and you will see that he is simply saying that if it follows its present policies towards the Palestinians, that in 25 years it will no longer exist looking like the present State of Israel. But so have many other observers, including this writer. However, like so many right-wingers in so many countries, it is not a good idea to confuse Netanyahu with facts, for if one tries to, they get very anxious.
At any rate, the main thing that Netanyahu did in his speech was to play the Holocaust card, which Israeli leaders have done so many times over the 70 years since Nazi Germany was defeated. But I am wondering if this time around Netanyahu has over-played the hand. First, oh, the dramatics. When accusing the UN, which has overwhelmingly approved the deal, of being silent in the face of a holocaust-like re-run: the silences and the angry stares. It's hard to know what this stone-faced man expected to accomplish with those. Good dramatic effect -- for his supporters, in Likud and the Republican Party. But he has few anywhere else, especially in a half-filled General Assembly chamber.
Then Netanyahu referred to Israel as "The Jewish State." That's not how the UN set it up and that's not how Israel's founding document referred to what back then was called "The State of Israel" either. Again, good propaganda to his base; not so good elsewhere.
Next, the irrepressible, blustering leader was talking as if he represented the world's Jews on the Iran deal question. The only problem there is that the Jewish community of the United States, about the same size (coincidentally around 6 million) as that of Israel, generally supports the deal (even if most of the leading "Jewish" organizations, the "Jewish establishment," don't). And of course, many Jews in Israel disagree with him too, including a prestigious group of Israeli military and security officials. So he is hardly talking for "The Jewish people."
Then there are the proposals that have periodically emanated from members of Netanyahu's governments or party, like Avigdor Lieberman, a former Israeli Foreign Secretary, that the "solution" (the "Final Solution"?) to the "Israeli Arab citizens" problem is to deport them to some reconstructed West Bank. And then there was another "Final Solution" to "solve" the "Gaza Problem," by expelling the Palestinians from it. In this context, just how many grains of salt do you think that UN members would be taking while taking in Bibi's "The Iran Deal is Just Like the Holocaust" speech (if they did at all)?
Further, taking a lesson from ISIS, Lieberman has also proposed beheading Israeli Arabs who do not subscribe to some "loyalty oath." UN members know this stuff. They also know that the Jews who were sent to the gas chambers by the Nazis were not carrying in front of them somewhere between 200 and 400 nuclear weapons of their own, with a variety of delivery systems (including several German[!] submarines), coming along not-too-far behind.