This article should be read in conjunction with an earlier one
entitled "Canadian Police (Again) Use Agents to Incite Response,' at http://sbeckow.wordpress.com/2010/06/28/canadian-police-again-use-provocateurs-to-incite-response/.
I speculate that, on the news, we're watching scenarios planned long ago by society's controllers. They have no chance of succeeding any more, but following their pre-planned scripts is all the controllers know how to do. I think they're trapped by their own inertia.
"Excuse
me, officer. Can you tell me where Yonge and Bloor is please?"
The cabal is on auto-pilot, doing
things that have been programmed into them as a system but which have no
force left and little likelihood of success.
If the police are already here, why is this car left to burn for this length of time?
What happened at the G20 summit in Toronto is, I think, a
brilliant example of this inertia or auto-pilot. The G20 held its meeting in downtown Toronto
and prepared a huge security machine to protect the G20 against ... whom?
Torontonians? Show me a more peaceful bunch than a group of Canadians.
We don't carry guns. For the most part, we respect human rights and cultural identity.
Now you may instantly say, well, look at the violence of the
protests.
Yes, but that's exactly the point. A credible case has been
made for that the violent "protesters" are agents provocateurs, police
officers out of uniform and wearing (all of them, apparently) identical
black balaclavas and police boots, and that's the auto-pilot factor I
want to talk about.
But to get there we need to backtrack a bit.
I think the Bush administration, supported by Northern Command and
NORAD, planned to take over Canada as an outcome of their "North
American Union" (read: "land grab"). If they had had their way, it would have included Mexico as
well.
The plan for a "North American Union," if I recall correctly,
never went before Congress. Had the United States morphed into a North
American Union, it could have ripped up that piece of paper George Bush
found so annoying ... the U.S. Constitution.
It could also have found creative ways to dump the U.S. debt in
the course of creating the new entity. Cabalists would have had
Canadian uranium to build their weapons of choice (depleted-uranium
weapons) as well as ownership of existing Canadian oil and
Arctic drilling rights.
Sweet deal.
The plan was articulated in a number of documents, some public,
some not. The ironically-named "Security and Prosperity Partnership"
(whose security? Whose prosperity? Not Canada's, certainly. We were yet another intended victim of American expansionism) stipulated
that either country could come to the "rescue" of the other in the event
of a terrorist attack or pandemic.
Now, let me see. Who is responsible for terrorist attacks and
pandemics? The cabal itself. If that sounds outrageous to you, you may be slightly behind the curve in 2010.
I can hardly imagine Canucks from Fort Petawawa, Ontario,
streaming into the U.S. and taking the place over. But I can well imagine troops from the U.S.
streaming into Canada.
Next Page 1 | 2
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).
The author is a former Member of the Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada and a member of Mensa Canada.
He is the author of several Internet books and articles on gender persecution, cross-cultural spirituality, life after death, and the 2012 (
more...)