Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 81 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H3'ed 2/3/20

D-Day In Iowa Update - The 2020 Election process Begins Today

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages)   4 comments, In Series: 2020 Poll Analyses
Election Day
Election Day
(Image by ShanMcG213)
  Details   DMCA

Beginning tomorrow I will be tracking the RealClearPolitics (RCP) final averages with the actual caucus or primary results, and I will also track who is getting it right and who is getting it wrong. Most pollsters got it very wrong in 2016, both in the state primary/caucus polls and thereafter preceding the general election. Both Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump significantly over-achieved the respective polls, and almost every pollster called the election, both the popular and electoral college votes for Hillary Clinton. Perhaps the best and most shocking example was Michigan where, according to Real Clear Politics, eighteen polls were conducted in advance of the primary with all eighteen predicting a Hillary Clinton victory by an average of 21.4 percentage points. Bernie Sanders won that primary by 1.5 percentage points, overachieving the Real Clear Politics projected average by 34%. For any number of reasons, which I will spell out in the months ahead, I expect polling to be even less accurate this year. OpEdNews will hold the pollsters accountable because the mainstream media and the Establishment poll tracking sites look the other way in the face of flawed polling methodology and poor results.

There were two new polls in Iowa released over the weekend:

 DFP/Civiqs has Sanders ahead with 28%, Warren in second with 21%, Buttigieg and Biden tied for third at 15%. Klobuchar in fifth at 8%

 Emerson has Sanders at 28%, Biden at 21%, Buttigieg at 15%, Warren at 14%, Klobuchar at 11%.

 Final average of 15 January Iowa polls: Sanders 23%; Biden 21%; Buttigieg 17%; Warren 16%; Klobuchar 9%

You can already see than the polls are all over the place with Sanders in the RCP lead, but with some pollsters calling it for Sanders by as much as +9 points, others calling it for Biden by +6, and one calling it for Buttigieg by + 2. One thing does seem clear though if one studies all the polls objectively: Bernie Sanders is ahead and is surging.

In New Hampshire:

 UMass/Lowel l: Sanders 23%; Biden 22%; Warren 19%; Buttigieg 12%; Gabbard 8%; Klobuchar 7%

 Boston Herald/FPU: Sanders 31%; Biden 24%; Warren 17%; Buttigieg 8%; Klobuchar 4%; Gabbard 3%

 WHDH/Emerson: Sanders 29%; Biden 14%; Buttigieg 13%; Warren 12%; Steyer & Klobuchar 8%; Gabbard & Yang 7%

 January average of 14 polls: Sanders 24%; Biden 19%; Warren & Buttigieg 14%; Klobuchar 6%; Gabbard 5%; Yang 4%; Steyer 3%. Sanders sits atop twelve of those. Early in the month Biden won one by + 4 and Buttigieg won one by + 1. Yet the pollsters are showing vastly different results even for Bernie Sanders. They show him ahead down the stretch by anywhere from + 1 to + 15.

 Final week of January: Sanders 28%; Biden 19%; Warren 15%; Buttigieg 12%; Klobuchar 6%; Gabbard 5%; Yang 3%; Steyer 3%

 RCP Average: Bernie Sanders by + 9.

Sanders is clearly pulling away in New Hampshire. Gabbard is surging, which I attribute to a backlash against CNN arrogantly scheduling town halls for every candidate on the eve of the primary everyone except Tulsi, that is. They have not responded to inquiries from the media or Gabbard with a reason for their boycott of Gabbard.

Finally, almost all of the pollsters are now asking respondents how certain they are about how they will vote. Sanders is coming out way ahead of the pack when this question is asked.

Must Read 1   Well Said 1   Valuable 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Jerry Policoff Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

I am a retired advertising sales executive/manager and am now Executive Director of the Assassination Archives and Research Center (AARC). I am also a member of the Senior Editor Team at Op Ed News. I also serve as Research Director and Board (more...)

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

Contact EditorContact Editor
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Obama Admin Seeks Permission To Lie In Response To Freedom Of Information Requests - Even To The Courts

Quinipiac: Sanders Trounces Clinton Nationally in Matchups Against ALL GOP Challengers

Barack Obama Spins the Facts, Takes Single-Payer Health Care Off the Table

PA Dem State Committee Takes Single-Payer Healthcare Mainstream, Unanimously Endorses It

Poll Excludes Single-Payer Healthcare; Respondents Implicitly Endorse It Anyway

Health Insurance Monopolies Are Illegal. There Is No Insurance Antitrust Exemption

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend