Power of Story
Send a Tweet        
- Advertisement -

Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 1 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 1 (2 Shares)  

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   No comments
OpEdNews Op Eds

Credulous Reporting of Deceptive Propaganda Made Planned Parenthood Attack Inevitable

By       Message Fair News     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 1   Valuable 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H4 12/13/15

- Advertisement -

See original here

By *Jim Naureckas



James O'Keefe in the pimp get-up he did not wear when he went in to smear ACORN.
(Image by (image: Fox News))
  Permission   Details   DMCA

- Advertisement -

The attack on Planned Parenthood was probably inevitable after the right saw how well the attack on ACORN was received.

ACORN, like Planned Parenthood, was at the top of the right's list of most-hated organizations, though in ACORN's case its chief sin was not helping women control their own bodies but rather helping poor people vote. ACORN was taken off the board by a series of deceptively edited, cunningly marketed hidden-camera videos, shot by right-wing prankster James O'Keefe (with Hannah Giles) and marketed by BigGovernment.com's Andrew Breitbart.

The story that the videos told about ACORN was repeated uncritically by elite reporters like the New York Times' Scott Shane (9/16/09):

- Advertisement -

"The undercover videos showed a scantily dressed young woman, Hannah Giles, posing as a prostitute, while a young man, James O'Keefe, played her pimp. They visited ACORN offices in Baltimore, Washington, Brooklyn and San Bernardino, Calif., candidly describing their illicit business and asking the advice of ACORN workers. Among other questions, they asked how to buy a house to use as a brothel employing underage girls from El Salvador... In the footage made public -- initially by a new website, BigGovernment.com -- ACORN employees raised no objections to the criminal plans. Instead, they eagerly counseled the couple on how to hide their activities from the authorities, avoid taxes and make the brothel scheme work."

As became clear when the tapes (and accompanying transcripts) were examined by more skeptical eyes, O'Keefe and Giles did not go into ACORN's offices in outlandish costumes. They presented O'Keefe as a concerned boyfriend trying to protect Giles from a fictional abusive pimp. The "advice" they got on how to evade taxes or set up brothels turned out to be the product of selective editing. (See FAIR Action Alert, 3/11/10; Extra!, 4/10.) In one instance, an ACORN employee called police to report the pair's suspicious visit (FAIR Blog, 7/23/10).

But rather than criticizing O'Keefe and Breitbart for perpetrating a hoax, leading corporate media outlets suggested apologetically that they should have done more to spotlight the misleading story. New York Times public editor Clark Hoyt (9/27/09) warned that if papers like his miss such stories, they might "wind up looking clueless or, worse, partisan."

Centrist media critics endorsed the deceptive project, with the Columbia Journalism Review (9/18/09) pronouncing, "ACORN got caught on candid camera, and they got caught good." The Washington Post's Howard Kurtz (10/7/09) wrote that the videos "proved to be a legitimate story," while Slate media critic Jack Shafer (9/23/09) claimed that even "critics of Breitbart and the filmmakers don't really dispute the basic information unearthed by the videos."

"I have to give you credit for this," ABC's George Stephanopoulos told Breitbart (This Week, 6/1/10); "on ACORN, you did expose people doing things they shouldn't do."


Shirley Sherrod, another victim of the right-wing smear factory.
(Image by (image: CNN))
  Permission   Details   DMCA
- Advertisement -

With encouragement like that -- not to mention that the video attack succeeded in driving ACORN to disband in April 2010 -- it's no wonder that O'Keefe and Breitbart continued to use the same unscrupulous techniques against the right's enemies. In July 2010, Breitbart released a tape of Agriculture Department official Shirley Sherrod in which she seemed to be boasting that she refused to help a white farmer because of his race. When the full tape of Sherrod's talk came out, it turned out she was actually talking about how she overcame her prejudices to help the farmer and recognize that "there is no difference between us." But by that point, Sherrod had already been forced out of her job (FAIR Blog, 7/21/10).

O'Keefe claimed another victim when he forced the resignation of NPR CEO Vivian Schiller after releasing a tape of an NPR fundraiser meeting with a fake Muslim charity (FAIR Blog, 3/11/11, 3/14/11). The tape as edited by O'Keefe appeared to show the fundraiser making light of Sharia law and asserting that the Republican Party had been "hijacked" by the Tea Party -- but an analysis of the full tape found that "several key scenes were edited misleadingly... Several of the most embarrassing moments were cobbled together or left out context" (Time, 3/13/11).

Why did O'Keefe in this case post the full video when it revealed his shenanigans? Time's James Poniewozik had a revealing take:

"If O'Keefe hadn't posted the source video, it would have invited suspicion.

"Instead he posted it and took the chance that most people would watch the edited video (or just clips from it on the news); that reporters, pressed for time with a stack of other assignments, would cover the edited video; that blogs (including, I will admit, this one) would link to those reports; and that by the time anyone took the time to go over the full video, the narrative would be established, the quotes stuck in people's minds and the ideological battle won."

Next Page  1  |  2

 

- Advertisement -

Must Read 1   Valuable 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

http://fair.org/

FAIR, the national media watch group, has been offering well-documented criticism of media bias and censorship since 1986. We work to invigorate the First Amendment by advocating for greater diversity in the press and by scrutinizing media (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon



Go To Commenting
/* The Petition Site */
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

North Dakota's War on 1st Amendment Goes From Bad to Worse

As Democratic Voters Shift Left, "Liberal Media" Keep Shifting Right

Neo-Nazi Group Linked to Murder of British MP Has Long Been Ignored by US Media

The People Are the Story -- and Corporate Media Are Missing It

Abuse Charges Against a Former Cop Are Disturbing -- as Is the Lack of Media Interest

Did Sanders Lie About Clinton's Oil Money? NPR Factchecker Can't Be Bothered to Check