Power of Story
Send a Tweet        
- Advertisement -

Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 2 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend (2 Shares)  

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   6 comments
General News

Congressman charges NPR with being "advocate" for government

By       Message Peter Duveen     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 2   Supported 2   Valuable 2  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Author 20762
Become a Fan
  (28 fans)
- Advertisement -

PETER'S NEW YORK, Friday, March 4, 2016--A U.S. congressman has charged National Public Radio with being a shill for the U.S. government, in spite of the insistence by one of NPR's star moderators that the radio network is a news organization that upholds the standards of objective journalism.

On NPR's "Morning Edition" syndicated news program yesterday, the program's moderator, David Greene, asserted that NPR maintained journalistic objectivity. "I do want to assure you, I mean, we're not promoting any cause here," said Greene. "I mean, it's our role to be journalists."

California Congressman Darrell Issa, who was being interviewed by Greene, immediately challenged Greene's assertion.

"David, you are being an advocate," said Issa. "So let's understand this - you keep returning to things that are said by the FBI that have already been shown to be not true. What the director is saying that you're paraphrasing simply isn't true."

- Advertisement -

The spat was over the recent insistence by the U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation that Apple Inc., the high-tech manufacturer, write computer code that would enable the FBI to access the cell phone of one of the alleged perpetrators of the December 2 massacre in San Bernardino, California.

A husband and wife, Syed Rizwan Farook and Tashfeen Malik, are accused by law enforcement with perpetrating the shootings that left 14 dead. The couple were mowed down by law enforcement in their van after the massacre, according to news reports. It appears they were not given the opportunity to surrender, and other circumstances surrounding the incident remain murky, such as whether the couple were armed or not.

Issa was insistent that NPR was deliberately taking on the government's viewpoint in the Apple case, rather than acting as an independent-journalistic arbiter. "Look, the government lies. Understand - this may be NPR - but the government lies to you," said Issa, according to an NPR transcript available on the network's website. "I have spent 10 years representing the people of California," he continued. "And I have seen governments, both Republican and Democratic, lie. If you want to promote the fact that your listeners can have all of their data remotely taken by their government at any time if they happen to get a FISA judge in secrecy to give them an authorization to do it, go ahead."

- Advertisement -

NPR has a disclaimer on its website saying that transcripts may contain errors, and that it stands only by the absolute accuracy of the audio of any broadcast over what could be a hastily compiled transcript. But PETER'S NEW YORK has found that the transcript appears to be an accurate representation of audio.

The interview stemmed from Issa's questioning of witnesses Wednesday at a congressional hearing on the FBI's insistence that Apple engineer a means of obtaining access to data on the one cell phone in question, apparently manufactured by Apple. But Issa asserts that the FBI's intention is to obtain much broader access.

"He doesn't want this one," Issa told Greene in the interview. "They have 12 more that they have. They have asked for unlock in other jurisdictions, other cases. And one of our witnesses, of course, has 175 that they want to unlock.

"It's not about terrorism at all," said Issa. "The issue is that the FBI asked for more than they needed. And if they were given it, it would set a bad precedent for all of America's liberties."

NPR and much of its distribution network receive federal funding, but also are kept afloat by corporate sponsors and contributions from their listening audiences. Critics contend the network is not much more than a "Radio Free Europe" directed at domestic American audiences.

###

- Advertisement -

 

- Advertisement -

Must Read 2   Supported 2   Valuable 2  
View Ratings | Rate It

Born in New York, March 14, 1949. Staff writer for the New York City Tribune, Economic Growth Report, Register-Star. Presently publish on OpEd News. Mr. Duveen heads up a project known as "The Museum of Brooklyn Art and Culture,' which explores (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon



Go To Commenting
/* The Petition Site */
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Virologist to make his case for lab origin of swine flu

Ron Paul: "Bailout" bill could trigger a major depression

Government pollution of MSM drives people to seek alternatives

Author Griffin: Obama, special prosecutor best hope for new 9-11 probe

Book review: A man turns his life around by confronting his demons