Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter 2 Share on Facebook 1 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 1 (4 Shares)  

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   3 comments
OpEdNews Op Eds

Chiding CEOs, At Walgreens & Other Corporate Defectors

By       Message Richard Eskow     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H2 7/26/14

Author 77715
Become a Fan
  (12 fans)

Cross-posted from Smirking Chimp

From youtube.com/watch?v=1qsRSqoTSbo: Headlines at 7:30: Will Walgreens move headquarters from Illinois to Switzerland? Walgreens could avoid paying $4 billion in U.S. taxes if the headquarters move abroad. Also, Amazon stock dropped 10 percent. .CBS This Morning. takes a ...
Will Walgreens move headquarters from Illinois to Switzerland? Walgreens could avoid paying $4 billion in U.S. taxes
(Image by YouTube)
  Permission   Details   DMCA

Walgreens is the pharmacy that, at least according to its website, can be found "at the corner of Happy & Healthy." If its executives have their way, however, it may soon be found near the intersection of Ziegelackerstrasse and Untermattweg in Bern, Switzerland. By acquiring a much smaller Swiss company which is located there, the American company can dodge millions in American taxes.

What would that mean for the 4,200 employees who work at Walgreens headquarters in Deerfield, Illinois? Probably nothing, as Deerfield's local newspaper (a branch of the Chicago Sun Times) explains. "Inversion," as these maneuvers are called, doesn't actually mean a company moves anything. Like the Panamanian flag fluttering on a second-class freighter, all it tells you is that a vessel for hire has found a new and more compliant registry.

Call it the "Inversion Evasion." Walgreens would become a "Swiss company" for tax avoidance purposes only. The combined corporation would do a small percentage of its business there. In all other respects, however, it would remain fully American -- headquartered here, making most of its profits here, and continuing to use its lobbying dollars and campaign money to distort the political process HERE. (Michael Hiltzik of the Los Angeles Times has more detail on the process.)

All of which raises the question: How does it feel to be the CEO of a "defector corporation"? Do such executives face the opprobrium of society as they continue to frequent fine dining establishments and enjoy the fruits of this land which has given them so much?

So far, apparently not. But that may be changing. The inversion evasion hasn't received much public attention, but it's quickly moving into the spotlight. Sen. Dick Durbin has already written a letter suggesting that Walgreens could become the subject of a boycott if it decides ("pretends" might be a better word) to become a Swiss corporation.

Durbin couldn't resist a jab at that "corner of Happy & Healthy" slogan either. That's just the latest of many Walgreens tag lines, including "Be well" and "The pharmacy America trusts." (Write your own joke, as Ed McMahon used to say.)

So far these moves have taken place under the public's radar. But "defector CEOs" may be beginning to feel the heat. That's usually when they call on cooperative (if not downright obsequious) journalists like Andrew Ross Sorkin of the New York Times. Sorkin's phone must have rung recently, because he has dutifully inflated and set aloft a puff piece on behalf of Heather Bresch, the CEO of a pharmaceutical company called Mylan and the daughter of United States Senator Joe Manchin of West Virginia.

The headline given to Sorkin's piece reads "Reluctantly, Patriot Flees Homeland for Greener Tax Pastures." That's a droll and inventive formulation which can be applied to many situations, as in: "Reluctantly, Loving Husband Flees Wife for Younger Woman."

Sorkin credulously reports that Bresch loves her country and "left" it (there's no evidence she'll physically relocate) with great regret, a rhetorical inversion which was received with mordant amusement in knowledgeable quarters. Bresch is unable to mount a coherent defense for her actions, despite Sorkin's tender ministrations. The usual "taxes are too high" trope is dug up, but when pressed by Sorkin she's unable to name a tax rate which would persuade her to keep the company in the US.

Maybe that's because she doesn't have a real complaint. Statutory corporate tax rates -- that is, the "official" rate -- are high in the United States, but the actual rate paid by corporations is quite low. It's just that there will always be a country out there willing to charge a little less, no matter how low our rates, in return for the chance to channel some funds out of the US economy.

The policy choice is simple: Either end "inversions" or be condemned to an endless race to the bottom on tax rates. That's a race the American people are doomed to lose.

Mylan and Bresch defected for an initial gain of 4 percent on Mylan's tax rate, according to Bresch herself, with the expectation that this advantage will roughly double in future years. (Bresch told Sorkin that Mylan's rate would drop from 25 percent to 21 percent and then to the "high teens.")

For that, Bresch and her colleagues are prepared to renounce their corporation's American "citizenship." (If corporations are "persons," as is the current legal fiction, they're certainly not very loyal ones.)

Now Walgreens seems poised to join that list. Walgreens CEO Greg Wasson unashamedly told analysts on a recent investor call that the company is actively exploring use of the inversion tactic. Like virtually all CEOs, Wasson is highly compensated. And, like most of them, he collects that compensation even when he has a very bad year. From the looks of things, he also shares with his peers a certain lack of patriotism.

What do Americans, especially older Americans, picture when they think of Walgreens? A 1950's-style corner drugstore, perhaps. A luncheonette counter, some stools, maybe a gleaming blender for whipping up milkshakes...

Next Page  1  |  2

 

- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rj-eskow/the-dumbest-bipartisa

Host of 'The Breakdown,' Writer, and Senior Fellow, Campaign for America's Future


Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon



Go To Commenting
/* The Petition Site */
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

How to Fix the Fed: Dismiss Dimon, Boot the Bankers, and Can the Corporations

The Top 12 Political Fallacies of 2012

Pawn: The Real George Zimmerman Story

What America Would Look Like If Libertarians Got Their Way

"F" The Bureaucracy! The White House Can Help Homeowners Right Now

"His Own Man's" Man: Jeb Bush and the Return of Wolfowitz