Benefits you will get 1. You can get $4,500 if new car is 10 MPG more fuel efficient than the older car 2. You can get $3,500 if new car is 4 MPG more fuel efficient than the older car 3. This bill sets aside $4 billion for 'Cash For Clunkers' program 4. You may trade in or buy a domestic or a foreign vehicle Who is eligible? 1. Only purchase or lease of new vehicles will qualify 2. Clunkers eligible for the program must get 18 MPG, or less 3. Must hold a valid legal title to the car seeking to trade in 4. Registered to the same owner for the full year preceding the trade-in Who is NOT eligible? 1. Cars that have not been insured for the past year 2. Cars that are older than 25 years 3. Cars not in drivable condition 4. New Car manufacturer's suggested retail price cannot exceed $45,000Source: cashforclunkersfacts.info. This site's only internet link is to a car insurance company, so it is trying to sell you something. Shockingly enough, I agree with Pandagon's Jesse Taylor, when he calls this, in effect, welfare for the middle class. Since the payment is good only if you buy a new car, it excludes pretty much everyone who can't afford to buy a new car. Naturally, Mrs Pico and I talked new cars with the salesman. If we were to do this, we'd trade in my 2000 Ford F-150 into the CfC program. I had already checked on the "official" mileage at http://fueleconomy.gov (that's where you need to go to check on your vehicle), and my truck is credited with a combined 16 MPG rating. Mrs Pico's 2002 Mustang is credited with 20 MPG, so her car doesn't qualify. But Mrs Pico needs a new vehicle more than I do. Not only is my truck in better shape, but that little light rear-wheel drive Mustang is terrible in the winter around here. So, she's looking at a Mercury Milan Hybrid. At 41 MPG city and 36 MPG highway (no, those numbers aren't reversed; that's what happens with hybrids), the MPG difference above my F-150 is well over 10, so we'd qualify for the $4,500 payment. The solution is simple: turn in the F-150, she gets the Mercury, then trade in the Mustang, and I get another truck. Not exactly in keeping with the spirit of the legislation, but it might well be within the letter of the law. :) Still, I'd rather see this clunker of a law undone, period, even though we could benefit personally. It's welfare for the well-off, and would do the least for the people who need it the most: people who own really inefficient cars but who can't afford to trade them in and buy new. More, and this really frosts me, we just bailed out