63 online
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 12 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Exclusive to OpEd News:
OpEdNews Op Eds    H3'ed 2/10/10

Can you imagine living in an America freed from constant wars?

By       (Page 1 of 3 pages)   2 comments
Message Michael Payne

I certainly can; it would be a new kind of America where war was no longer such a dominant part of our lives and our national discourse. A nation that could use its great wealth for positive developments such as better systems of education, universal health care, creation of alternates to fossil fuels, improving our infrastructure, and providing a safer environment for our society. That would be, in effect, "American the Beautiful" becoming a reality. But that's not the America in which we currently live.

No, unfortunately, we live in an entirely different kind of America. The America of today is certainly not using its great wealth (still the biggest economy in the world and the wealthiest nation) to build strength into our nation by all those meaningful initiatives I mentioned. Over the past several decades our government and our leaders have drastically shifted America's priorities into expanding our influence and military power all over the world. And our nation and this society have suffered mightily as a result.

What we need is a new formula for the way we conduct the affairs of this nation. This is a critical issue, something that needs immediate attention and must become an important part of our national agenda; we have to face the fact that this nation is going in the wrong direction; one that must be quickly reversed. But right now there is just too much apathy as we watch in silence and submissiveness while the wealth of our nation is stripped away and used to build an American Empire that neither we, nor the world, needs or wants.

Let's do some fairly radical, innovative and constructive thinking about the state of our nation. Let's do a kind of "what if" analysis that would involve taking one half of our current Pentagon budget of $1 trillion annually and transferring that $500 billion into our general treasury to be used for domestic purposes. What, some will say? That will seriously weaken America and make us less safe

Would the U.S. immediately be thrown into grave danger because there would only be $500 billion (that's $500,000,000,000) available each year to protect the American people on our soil and to protect our interests abroad? If we strategically reduced our approximately 750 military installations around the world would we leave ourselves open to attack by some major power that sees us as substantially weaker? Would we immediately be run over by attacks by Al-Qaeda and other terrorist groups that see us as severely weakened and highly vulnerable? Absolutely not. We would still have, by far, the most powerful military forces in the world.

With all our current military might spread all over this planet, why exactly is it that Americans still don't feel safe in their own country? Why do we react with so much fear and anxiety over the possibility of another "shoe bomber" or an "underpants bomber" attacking us? I say that the fear and paranoia persists because Americans watch our military chasing terrorists all over the world while, at the same time, our nation continues to remain extremely vulnerable within our own borders.

But what will happen with Iraq and the Afghan War is we reduce the spending on defense? In the case of Iraq, that totally fraudulent war foisted upon the American people, the U.S. should simply follow the current plan to have all troops leave that country by the end of 2011; with absolutely no exceptions. The military will try to change or delay that plan but Mr. Obama must not cave in to it.

President Obama has indicated that we will begin troop withdrawal from Afghanistan by mid-2011 and he must develop a concrete plan to follow through. Again, the military is already making noises and beginning to challenge his stated intentions, but Obama must not let the generals make policy decisions about the war. He must stand firm. He is the Commander-in-Chief and, in that capacity, his responsibility is not just to wage war but to also end war when that is in the best interests of this nation; or when it is essential to maintain our economic stability.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Rate It | View Ratings

Michael Payne Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

Contact EditorContact Editor
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Orwell's "1984" becoming a reality in modern-day America

Heed the Warning Signs; America is Edging Ever Closer to a Societal Implosion

Ethics and Morals in America; an Endangered Species

How Do You Spell Sociopath? G-O-P

The Beginning of the End for the U.S. Dollar as the World Reserve Currency

A U.S. President Defies Congress, the Constitution and the Will of the People; Will Impeachment Follow?

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend