Power of Story Send a Tweet        
- Advertisement -
OpEdNews Op Eds

California's tale for Colorado's Amendment 58 supporters

By Antonia Juhasz  Posted by Rady Ananda (about the submitter)       (Page 1 of 1 pages)     Permalink

Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H3 10/17/08

- Advertisement -

Originally posted at The Daily Camera Newspaper (Boulder, Colorado) 

It was the most expensive ballot measure ever fought in U.S. political history.  Proposi­tion 87, which appeared on the November 2006 California state ballot, would have imple­mented a small fee per barrel of oil drilled within the state and directed the funds to in­vestments in alternative ener­gy.  When Prop 87 was first in­troduced, in July 2006, more than 60 percent of Californians polled supported it.  But at the voting booth in November, the measure was defeated 55 to 45 percent.

What took place in the inter­vening five months is the story of how Big Oil flexes its mus­cle.  It is a cautionary tale for Coloradans supporting Amendment 58 that would end the $200 million annual prop­erty tax break for oil and gas companies and apply a flat 5 percent severance tax to fund college scholarships.

Money lies at the heart of this story.  For every dollar the supporters of Prop 87 spent, the oil companies spent two and were always prepared to spend more.  Already in Colo­rado, while Amendment 58 has raised some $981,000, op­ponents have raised nearly seven times more money, with $6.6 million so far, according to The Denver Post.

- Advertisement -
Oil companies spent over $100 million to defeat Califor­nia's Prop 87.  And while you never saw their names in the "paid for" line of any commer­cial or printed on the back of any campaign flyer, it was Chevron, ExxonMobil, Shell, and Occidental that led the charge against the measure.

"When we launched a cam­paign against Big Oil," ex­plained Prop 87 communica­tions director Yusef Robb, "the people of California did not un­derstand that Big Oil was our opponent.  It was cloaked be­hind front groups, consultants, and lobbyists, and the cloak was secured by the lack of me­dia scrutiny."  Media inquiries made to the oil companies were diverted to the campaign's front group, Californians Against Higher Taxes, virtually 100 percent funded by oil company money, or to the California Chamber of Commerce — a huge recipi­ent of oil industry largesse on the local, state, and national levels with boards of directors littered with past and present oil industry executives.

The mantra repeated in ev­ery ad, mailer, and by every spokesperson focused on the one thing that scares Californi­ans even more than global warming: higher gas prices.

- Advertisement -
Prop 87 opponents argued that prices would go up because costs would rise and oil com­panies would be forced to abandon California.  This claim was supported by an "indepen­dent" expert analysis provided by LECG, a consulting firm, which, as it turned out, had been paid over $94,000 by the opponents of Prop 87 to write the report and share the re­sults with the public.

Economists challenged as specious the claim that gas prices would rise and the com­panies would be forced to leave the state.  The tax was simply too small to have any meaningful impact on the ex­penditures of these mega cor­porations — the wealthiest companies in world history.

Coloradans should take heed: The money, the media ­blitz, and the misleading in­formation were impenetrable.

On Election Day 2006, the No. 1 issue that Californians said guided their overwhelming "no" votes against Prop 87 was the fear of rising gasoline prices.

Antonia Juhasz grew up in Boulder and today lives in San Francisco. She is the author of "The Tyranny of Oil: The World's Most Powerful Industry — and What We Must Do to Stop It "(HarperCollins, Oct. 7, 2008), and will be in Boulder discussing her book on Oct. 22 at a public event hosted at KGNU radio station.
See
www.TyrannyofOil.org for more information.

 

- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

In 2004, Rady Ananda joined the growing community of citizen journalists. Initially focused on elections, she investigated the 2004 Ohio election, organizing, training and leading several forays into counties to photograph the 2004 ballots. She officially served at three recounts, including the 2004 recount. She also organized and led the team that audited Franklin County Ohio's 2006 election, proving the number of voter signatures did not match official results. Her work appears in three books.

Her blogs also address religious, gender, sexual and racial equality, as well as environmental issues; and are sprinkled with book and film reviews on various topics. She spent most of her working life as a researcher or investigator for private lawyers, and five years as an editor.

She graduated from The Ohio State University's School of Agriculture in December 2003 with a B.S. in Natural Resources.

All material offered here is the property of Rady Ananda, copyright 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009. Permission is granted to repost, with proper attribution including the original link.

"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." Tell the truth anyway.

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon Share Author on Social Media   Go To Commenting

The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

- Advertisement -