The verdict for Manning was predetermined, and the show trial in a kangaroo court -- a post-modern American remix of China in the 1960s during the Cultural Revolution -- just signed, sealed and delivered it.
The President of the United States (POTUS) had already said he was guilty. US corporate media had been screaming for three years he was guilty. Now the US government -- who criminalized Manning with "evil intent" -- has shown there will be hell to pay for anyone who dares to reveal American war crimes, which are, by definition, unpunishable.
As if there was a need of additional evidence of the "bright" future awaiting Edward Snowden -- right on top of US Attorney General Eric Holder's pathetic letter promising Snowden would not be tortured if extradited to the US.
All this as the Angel of History once more threw a bolt of lightning irony; Bradley Manning was pronounced guilty on no less than 19 counts by a Pentagon judge just next door to Spy Central, the NSA headquarters in Fort Meade, Maryland.
Manning is an Oklahoman -- just like music legend J.J. Cale, who died a few days ago. It was his decision to have his case heard not by a panel of military jurors -- a close match to the Spanish Inquisition -- but by a sole presiding military judge, Col. Denise Lind.
This was not exactly a sound move -- as Lind was duly offered a carrot to go with the stick, in the form of a promotion to the US Army Court of Appeals after the show trial.
Unsurprisingly, Pentagon prosecutors defined Manning as a "traitor," a hacker and an anarchist (yes, hackers and anarchists are worse criminals than al-Qaeda jihadists; after all, they are "our" allies in Syria).
The show trial had a Kafkaesque imprint all the way through. The Pentagon hacks at first refused to release court documents. Lind perfected a torture practice of reading for hours from abstruse rulings. Only under threat of a lawsuit from the media in a civilian court, the Pentagon reluctantly started releasing the odd document -- obviously redacted to oblivion.
Manning's defense argued he was a legitimate whistleblower; he never expected the leaked information to aid the enemy. Yet Lind denied a request by Manning's attorneys to throw out the charge. She said he learned as a low-level intelligence analyst that the public release of secret information would risk US national security. The US government was adamant that Manning knew he was helping al-Qaeda when he released more than 700,000 documents to WikiLeaks.
Lind even altered the charges when the trial was over to suit the US government. US corporate media was too busy to notice it, reveling in the New York mayoral race scandal.
The fact that Manning was found not guilty of aiding the enemy still leaves him guilty on no less than 19 counts, including "wantonly cause to be published on the internet intelligence belonging to the US government" -- enough to possibly guarantee him decades of (military) jail time well into the 22nd century.
After sentencing, it will be up to Maj. Gen. Jeffrey Buchanan -- the new commander for the Military District of Washington. He will review the case -- and in theory has the power to reduce Manning's overall sentence. Holding one's breath is not recommended.
The enemy is you
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, correctly, said on Friday that if Manning was convicted of aiding the enemy that would be "the end of national security journalism in the United States."
Still, the US government and the Pentagon will keep taking no prisoners in their campaign to criminalize investigative journalism from the inside (that's what Manning and Snowden did) and on the outside (as in WikiLeaks and the work of Glenn Greenwald).
The hellish circular logic of the US government rules that to publish information on the internet means spying. So if the enemy goes on the internet, you are enabling the enemy. Manning being found not guilty of aiding the enemy but mostly guilty of everything else still delivers the message -- translated in decades in a military prison.