Reprinted from RT
It does not matter that the National Iranian American Council -- which happens to be widely respected in Washington itself -- has forcefully come out in defense of the deal.
It does not matter that the Obama administration can count on the combined efforts of the so-called E3 ambassadors (Britain, France and Germany) in Washington, who are exhausting themselves to explain the obvious: This is an international treaty, already approved by the United Nations, and not a parochial squabble decided in Idaho.
On the other hand, it does matter that the Obama administration has not been forceful enough to defend its strategy as well as the result of such a long and treacherous negotiation.
So there are now two narratives shaping the battle ahead in Washington...
1) Iran is a rogue nation, an existential threat to Israel, and it cannot be trusted. It will breach the deal, so the deal must be rejected to the benefit of... perpetual sanctions, or war.
2) Iran is a rogue nation, it cannot be trusted, but we have all the verification mechanisms in place and as soon as Iran "cheats" -- as it will -- we launch immediate "snap back" sanctions.
No wonder, under these circumstances, Washington simply cannot be trusted by Tehran.Who's really trustworthy?
Now for the other side of the narrative.
On July 18, four days after the deal was signed in Vienna, Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei -- foreseeing which way the D.C. wind would be blowing -- went straight to the point; his intervention delineated the parameters according to which Iran would work to actively debunk a massive propaganda machine that continues to demonize the Islamic Republic even as it touts a victory for Western diplomacy.
The victory in Vienna was in fact for diplomacy tout court -- East and West working together.
Even before his speech, Khamenei had already touched upon the key point when he sent a short message to President Hassan Rouhani a day after the deal.
This is the money quote:
"...it is necessary to very carefully study the text that has been prepared, so that it can then move in the legal direction that has been determined for it. Then, in the case of ratification, it is necessary to be on the alert for possible breaches of agreements by the other side and the blocking of its path. You know very well that some of the six governments in the opposite camp are not trustworthy in any way."
The E3 may not be entirely "trustworthy," but here, it's all about business; there's nothing Britain, France, Germany -- and the rest of the EU, for that matter -- want more than restarting business with Iran in the energy front and beyond.
The battle in Washington, on the other hand, will be gruesome, even as the Obama administration remains confident the dogs of war don't have the necessary votes to block the implementation of the deal, as Iranian diplomats confirmed to me in Vienna during the negotiations.
In Tehran, on the other hand, the deal should be approved by the Consultative Assembly with no problems.