116 online
 
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 66 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Exclusive to OpEd News:
OpEdNews Op Eds    H2'ed 3/1/23

Blowback from Stock Buybacks

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages)   1 comment

Joel Joseph
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Joel Joseph

By Joel D. Joseph

Blowback is a term coined by the Central Intelligence Agency to describe the unintended consequences of policies kept secret from the American people. Blowback from massive stock buybacks this year will exacerbate increasing inequality in the United States and reduce corporate investments in new equipment and research and development.

According to the Wall Street Journal (February 28, 2023), corporate buybacks will reach one trillion dollars for the first time this year. Leading the buyback parade are Chevron, ExxonMobil, Meta and Goldman Sachs. These corporations are flush with cash because of Trump's 2017 tax cut that slashed the corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%. It is outrageous that individual tax rates are higher than corporate rates. I thought that since corporations, according to the Supreme Court, are people, that they should pay taxes at the same rate as individuals do.

And further, many large corporations pay no taxes at all. According to the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, at least 55 of the largest corporations in America paid no federal corporate income taxes on their 2020 profits. One of those companies is Federal Express, which is using its tax savings to repurchase billions of dollars-worth of its stock. Another tax dodger, Nike, is buying back $18 billion worth of its stock.

Chevron and Exxon are leading the movement to buy their own shares. Chevron is purchasing $75 billion of its stock while ExxonMobil is buying $35 billion of its own shares. These two oil giants earned windfall profits when the price of oil rose because of the war in the Ukraine. Chevron and Exxon should be investing in alternative energy sources instead of buying their own stock because it is obvious that with electric car sales exploding, the future of the oil business is shaky.

Meta, the owner of Facebook, is buying $40 billion of its stock. At the same time, Meta laid off 13% of its work force. Something is wrong with this picture. With all of this excess cash, Meta should be expanding its business, buying other companies, or doing something more productive than raising its share price artificially.

Goldman Sachs, the investment banking firm, is also buying its own shares while firing 3,000 employees. Goldman is using $30 billion of its profits to buy its own shares. Goldman is enriching its richest employees while firing its poorest ones.

The Harvard Business Review (January 7, 2020) recommended that stock buybacks be banned because "The investment in the knowledge base that makes a company competitive goes far beyond R&D expenditures. In fact, in 2018, only 43% of companies in the S&P 500 Index recorded any R&D expenses, with just 38 companies accounting for 75% of the R&D spending of all 500 companies. Whether or not a firm spends on R&D, all companies must invest broadly and deeply in the productive capabilities of their employees in order to remain competitive in global markets. Stock buybacks made as open-market repurchases make no contribution to the productive capabilities of the firm."

The Harvard Business Review concluded that stock buybacks have increased income inequality, employment stability and anemic productivity. When the majority of corporate profits go to buybacks, there is little money left to invest in employees and the future growth of the company.

Stock buybacks help senior corporate executives in the short term buy boosting stock prices. These executives often own large chunks of stock and options, and are acting in their own personal interest, not in the long-term interest of the corporation or of the country as a whole.

A trillion dollars in stock buybacks is a symptom of what is wrong with the U.S. economy. That trillion dollars should be in the government's pocket and used to pay down the federal debt.

This trillion-dollar war chest could also be used by corporations to enhance paychecks of workers at the bottom of the corporate pyramid, those worker bees who are actually making things. Additionally, the trillion dollars could also be used for research and development to create new products or make better products.

Well Said 1   Valuable 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Joel Joseph Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

CEO of California Association for Recycling All Trash, www.Calrecycles.com and CEO of Genuine-American Merchandise & Equipment, www.genuine-american.com, manufacturers of tennis equipment in the USA (Tennis Wellbow, Good Vibe vibration (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The End of Recessions in the United States?

The Trumps and Jared Kushner Cheated Their Way into Elite Colleges

Outsourcing Obamacare

Red Nose Day Gives Black Eye to Walgreens and NBC

Shame on Ralph Lauren and the US Open

Great American Products to Buy Labor Day Weekend

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend