Bloomberg's comparison is unreasonable. In the case of Rice, students objected to the university's choice of her as commencement speaker. A commencement speaker should be someone students can look up to. It is perfectly reasonable to oppose the selection of a war criminal to receive an honorary degree.
The case of research into gun control is completely different. The research is not an honor bestowed on someone. The speech represents no particular partisan point of view.
Would it be reasonable to oppose the selection of Charles Koch as commencement speaker? I think so.
In any case, as long as the students don't use violence, it is completely within their right to state their preferences loudly.
Bloomberg is trying to silence those students and deny them their free speech rights, and I'm calling him out for it. He's free to speak and free, even, to try to silence others. I'm free to criticize his speech as being unreasonable.





