Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 37 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing Summarizing
OpEdNews Op Eds      

Arlington: Confederate Memorial Removal Contradicts the Union's Civil War Premise

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages)   1 comment

Thomas Knapp
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Thomas Knapp

Confederate Monument - S face tight - Arlington National Cemetery - 2011.
Confederate Monument - S face tight - Arlington National Cemetery - 2011.
(Image by Wikipedia (commons.wikimedia.org), Author: Confederate_Monument_-_S_face_-_Arlington_National_Cemetery_-_2011.JPG: Tim1965 derivative work: Tim1965)
  Details   Source   DMCA

"A Confederate memorial is to be removed from Arlington National Cemetery in northern Virginia in the coming days, " the Associated Press reports, as "part of the push to remove symbols that commemorate the Confederacy from military-related facilities."

For years, I've been of two minds about the movement to remove these memorials.

On one hand, I generally object to the idea of "government property" being used for such purposes. In fact, I object to the very idea of "government property," but if there's going to be such a property claim I want its allowable uses and purposes to a least be very narrowly defined. So yeah, take down the memorials -- all of them, not just the Confederate ones.

On the other hand, I'm a fan of history, and the memorials in question illustrate the history of (and the history following) America's single greatest and most violent convulsion, a "Civil War" resulting in several hundred thousand deaths.

Arlington National Cemetery is part of that history. It's situated on land confiscated from Confederate general Robert E. Lee, and several hundred Confederates lie among the Civil War dead buried there.

While the 1914 monument erected to those Confederates bears certain features the present generation may find offensive (e.g. a slave following his "owner" to war), it also bears the inscription "they have beat their swords into plough-shares and their spears into pruning hooks." It is, in fact, a monument to reunification, not division, and to peace, not war. What's not to like about that?

What was the Union premise for the war? That the United States was "one nation, indivisible."

If that premise is correct (I don't believe it is, but IF), then the Confederate dead are American dead, and precisely as entitled to American honors and memorials as the Union dead.

During the Mexican War, later Union general and US president Ulysses S. Grant wrote to his fiancee: "If we have to fight, I would like to do it all at once and then make friends."

The post-war era didn't really accomplish that. After "Reconstruction," the south largely recreated the former slave system in all but name, leaving its demolition to the civil rights movement of a century later, and to this very day, southern "Lost Cause" revisionists and revanchists keep the flames of Confederate sympathies burning.

But the Union, not the Confederacy, won that war -- a war it fought on and for the premise of a single America including the former Confederacy and former Confederates.

Desecrating the graves of the Confederate dead, denying them commemoration on land seized from their most esteemed commander, sends exactly the opposite message. It's an attempt to preserve, not end, the divisions the war was all about.

Rate It | View Ratings

Thomas Knapp Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Thomas L. Knapp is director and senior news analyst at the William Lloyd Garrison Center for Libertarian Advocacy Journalism (thegarrisoncenter.org). He lives and works in north central Florida.


Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter

Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The Big Question About the UN Security Council's Gaza Ceasefire Resolution

2020: I'm So Sick of Superlatives

Hypocrisy Alert: Republicans Agreed with Ocasio-Cortez Until About One Minute Ago

America Doesn't Have Presidential Debates, But It Should

Murder On The High Seas: Trump May Be Immune, But Are His Co-Conspirators?

Chickenhawk Donald: A Complete and Total Disgrace

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend