"A banker is a fellow who lends you his umbrella when the sun is shining, but wants it back the minute it begins to rain." Mark Twain
Strange, isn't it, that economic troubles on opposite sides of the Earth would have identical cures. Or perhaps all economic crises have the same cure. In September of 2008 the Icelandic government took a 75% ownership stake in Landsbanki bank after the bank faced liquidity problems. Landsbanki had been on the cutting edge of the "new banking" industry, offering high interest, online savings accounts called "Icesave." The lure was irresistible and 300,000 British citizens deposited their savings worth almost five billion dollars.
Many -- most, if not all -- forgot to read the fine print where it said that the deposits were not insured, as regular accounts would be. So, when Landsbanki went in the tank, the British government looked to the Icelandic government and said, "We want our money back!"
The Icelanders answered, "We don't have your money, and besides, the accounts were uninsured." They were covered under a little known provision called "top-up" rules and would have to depend on Icelandic Compensation Scheme. Landsbanki was the second of three Icelandic banks to fail so the ICS was done.
In October, British officials tried to use anti-terrorism statutes to freeze Icelandic assets in the United Kingdom. Iceland filed a complaint with NATO, and Iceland's Prime Minister answered by hiring a high-profile British law firm to represent Iceland in legal matters. What was going on there was a proxy war; rather than governments mobilizing troops and navies, banking interests were mobilizing governments and lawyers.
The bankers and the UK government came up with a repayment plan for Iceland. Under its terms Iceland would repay with up to 40% of the island's gross domestic product, costing every household in Iceland $61,000. Iceland's President Olafur Grimsson refused to sign the plan, putting it instead to a public referendum. Not since the treaty of Versailles has there been a more punitive treaty to punish the many for the deeds of a few.
When the financial crisis came to the United States, the banking interests simply went to Hank Paulson and said, "If we don't get new money, and quick, the economy will fall down." Paulson relayed that message to President Bush and the banks were bailed out. Iceland is the same scenario in reverse. Due to the blockade Iceland was forced to borrow money from the world's loan shark, the International Monetary Fund.
The IMF will lend money but always attaches conditions and stipulations that hamper and hamstring the borrowing nation. They become, in effect, a co-equal, unelected government. So Iceland is being financially conquered by an economic war, run not by generals but by bankers.
The problems in Greece have been a long time in coming. In November of 2009 the new Greek government revealed that its debt level was 12.7% of GDP, twice what had been previously announced. The new government's budget was designed to address the budget shortfall, bringing its deficit down to 8.7% of GDP. The new budget promised a 10% cut in Social Security spending, abolished bonuses at state-owned banks and added a 90% tax on all private bank employee bonuses. Greek Prime Minister Papandreou also promised to strenuously fight corruption and tax evasion.
In December, Standard & Poors put the country's A- sovereign rating on negative watch, and the Fitch rating agency, which had cut the Greek credit rating to A- on the higher deficit announcement, cut the sovereign rating again to BBB+ on the government's austerity promises. On December 16, S& P cut the Greek credit rating again to BBB- saying, "Austerity steps announced by Prime Minister Papandreou are unlikely to produce a sustainable reduction in the public debt burden."
In January Prime Minister Papandreou said the following, "There is only one dilemma: Will we let the country go bankrupt or will we react? Will we let the speculators strangle us, or will we take our fate in our own hands?"
The world of hedge funds is like betting on the line at a crap table. You can bet that the shooter will make their point or you can bet against them making their point. Yet, in this world, the banks control the dice. As the large financial institutions sell off Greek debt it creates pressures to raise interest rates on future Greek loans, meaning more profits for the banks. This situation, however, is like Iceland's in that more profits are nice but not nearly as nice as control.