Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 16 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H3'ed 10/26/16

An Outrageous Merger

By       (Page 1 of 3 pages)     (# of views)   2 comments
Author 506474
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Nicholas Johnson
Become a Fan
  (1 fan)

AT&T
AT&T
(Image by JeepersMedia)
  Details   DMCA

It's outrageous that AT&T and Time Warner may be permitted to merge.

Of course, there are antitrust issues.

If it's approved, some competitors will go out of business, others won't get started, and consumers will pay more and get less.

Antitrust law is not designed to regulate anticompetitive behavior; it is designed to prevent anticompetitive behavior.

Permitting AT&T to acquire Time Warner would be like giving a small boy a ball and then saying, "Now don't bounce it" -- or hiring someone to watch him.

Regulation doesn't work. What's called "agency capture" is widespread and well documented. In the BP oil-spill case, it involved the regulators literally sleeping with the regulated. Even if an agency isn't captured it probably doesn't have enough personnel to do meaningful regulation. The FCC of my day had three employees to respond to 85,000 complaints, and they travelled in pairs.

The only way to prevent anticompetitive corporate behavior is to forbid the mergers that make it possible.

But antitrust law and lawyers often have ways of finding adequate competition when no one else can see it. Moreover, the serious antitrust issues and economic impact of this proposed merger are the least of our concerns.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

 

Must Read 3   Well Said 3   Supported 3  
Rate It | View Ratings

Nicholas Johnson Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Nicholas Johnson is best known for his tumultuous seven-year term as a Federal Communications Commission commissioner (1966-1973), while publishing How to Talk Back to Your Television Set, 400 separate FCC opinions, and appearing on a Rolling (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Kushner's Back-Channel Multiple Tragedies

Our Revolution: Yes; But First Some Questions

Law, Social Norms and Trump

Hillary's New Emails: A Solution for FBI Director Comey

What's a Republican to Do?

NFL: Really 'Sports' or Just a TV Series?