Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 4 (4 Shares)  

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   1 comment
OpEdNews Op Eds

An Argument Against the Taxpayer-Funded Research Advocated by Richard A. Friedman, M.D.

By       Message Thomas Farrell     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 3 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 1   Well Said 1   News 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H2 7/19/15

Author 38575
Become a Fan
  (20 fans)
From flickr.com/photos/33711502@N06/3138247450/: An argument against tax-payer funded psychotherapy clinical trials.
An argument against tax-payer funded psychotherapy clinical trials.
(Image by brain_blogger)
  Permission   Details   DMCA
p class="">Duluth, Minnesota (OpEdNews) July 19, 2015: The now former Soviet Union officially outlawed the practice of religion. As a result, religionists in the United States tended to be anti-communist during the Cold War.

Naturally American capitalists also tended to be anti-communist during the Cold War.

Now today in our contemporary culture wars, secular humanists tend to be anti-religion, just as the Soviet communists were.

By definition, secular humanists hold a materialistic philosophic position, just as the Soviet communists did. That is, for secular humanists, there is simply no room in their philosophic position for any serious consideration of the possibility of the immaterial.

By definition, the immaterial is also referred to as the spiritual.

Now, if you hold a materialistic philosophic view of the human person, then both the human body and the human psyche, which depends on the human brain, are obviously material. For this reason, medical doctors in the specialty of psychiatry tend to view all possible problems in the human condition as material.

For example, Richard A. Friedman, M.D., a professor of clinical psychiatry at Weill Cornell Medical College in New York City, expresses a materialistic philosophic view of the human person in his op-ed "Psychiatry's Identity Crisis" in the New York Times (dated July 17, 2015, at the NYT website, but published in the NYT print edition dated July 19, 2015.)

Friedman characterizes himself as "a psychiatrist and psychopharmacologist who loves neuroscience."

For Friedman, the entire possible realm of human problems is encompassed by the body and the body's brain that influences the human psyche.

Now, given Friedman's basic philosophic position, he would undoubtedly reduce any possible problems that I might refer to as spiritual problems to problems of the human psyche that depends on the human brain. In short, his materialism is reductive.

But like many secular humanists, Friedman has enormous faith in modern science.

Basically, Friedman argues that more of the taxpayers' money should be allocated for psychotherapy clinical trials research than is currently allocated.

But what if the practice of psychotherapy is not on the right track?

Friedman's reductive materialism to the contrary notwithstanding, what if there really are spiritual problems involved in what ails certain persons?

By definition, a practice of psychotherapy based on secular humanism does not seem to be equipped to speak to spiritual problems or issues, because secular humanism reduces everything about the human condition to the material.

Like Friedman, C. G. Jung, M.D., was a psychiatrist. However, unlike Friedman, Jung was not a secular humanist.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

 

- Advertisement -

Must Read 1   Well Said 1   News 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

www.d.umn.edu/~tfarrell
Thomas James Farrell is professor emeritus of writing studies at the University of Minnesota Duluth (UMD). He started teaching at UMD in Fall 1987, and he retired from UMD at the end of May 2009. He was born in 1944. He holds three degrees from Saint Louis University (SLU): B.A. in English, 1966; M.A.(T) in English 1968; Ph.D.in higher education, 1974. On May 16, 1969, the editors of the SLU student newspaper named him Man of the Year, an honor customarily conferred on an administrator or a faculty member, not on a graduate student -- nor on a woman up to that time. He is the proud author of the book (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon



Go To Commenting
/* The Petition Site */
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Was the Indian Jesuit Anthony de Mello Murdered in the U.S. 25 Years Ago? (BOOK REVIEW)

Who Was Walter Ong, and Why Is His Thought Important Today?

More Americans Should Live Heroic Lives of Virtue (Review Essay)

Martha Nussbaum on Why Democracy Needs the Humanities (Book Review)

Hillary Clinton Urges Us to Stand Up to Extremists in the U.S.

Matthew Fox's Critique of the Roman Catholic Church