23 online
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 25 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
General News   

American Politics Go Deeper Than Politics

By       (Page 1 of 3 pages)   2 comments
Message Paul Von Ward

A large majority of citizens think elections in the United States do not affect change in  Washington's policies. They believe government decisions mostly benefit the wealthy  who rig the system for themselves. So, why do so many uninformed voters support  policy-empty slogans? Could it be more of an emotional exercise than a mental one?

At some level, each of all seven-plus billion humans lives in a different reality. I can't fully  get inside your mind. With our best efforts, you cannot see the world exactly like I do.  However, we humans cluster into a half-dozen or so powerful and conflicting existential  worldviews.

War of Worldviews

The current campaign is a battleground to control reality-shaping beliefs. In a waning,  but still powerful world culture--it is part of a worldwide struggle of unprovable beliefs  being fought with evangelical ferocity regardless of their religious or secular bases.  American politics is just a proxy war for these competing existential worldviews.

Given the present fragmentation of species' consciousness, the worldview concept is  not an academic fantasy. It is the basis of conflicts involving access to wealth and  natural resources and use of deadly weapons. It prevents creation of a human-friendly  economy, maintenance of a viable ecosystem, and development of a civil political order.

In its first two centuries, the United States developed institutions to protect individual  freedoms. But, with increasing technologies and population that weaken the planet's  ecological health, humans need group-focused institutions to successfully live together.

Once again, America is the focal point in a global experiment: Can we treat worldviews  of others as worthy of consideration as our own? Do we have the courage to submit our  most sacred cosmological beliefs to a public re-examination? Can we find ways to  synthesize conflicting worldviews into a bigger picture that includes all the evidence?

Emotion-Energized Worldviews

The human mind lives in a cosmos of uncertainty. When we don't know the answers to  existential questions (who, what, and where are we?), we make up answers that give us  a sense of certainty. These assumptions foster a sense of a stability when we confront a  lack of knowledge or fears created by a world that we can't understand or dominate.

On the positive side, fundamental worldviews generate a sense of personal pride. They  motivate us to take on hardships or feel worthy when among people who are unlike us. They even determine how we face death. It is self-evident that belief is a tangible force.

Psychologists have identified different behavioral patterns linked to varying worldviews.  For the general reader, Scientific American on-line has described studies that have face  validity in that they link particular beliefs with behaviors. Following are some examples:

Emily Laber-Warren writes "According to the experts who study political leanings,  liberals and conservatives do not just see things differently. They are different--in their  personalities and even their unconscious reactions to the world around them."

Jesse Bering concludes that "We're all susceptible to tales of the supernatural ... but  genuine belief matters. [In a laboratory experiment a] concocted spiritual entity ... was  real enough in their minds ... to affect ... behavior in an empirically demonstrable way."

According to Daisy Grewal "Choice is a fundamental American [worldview] belief ...  Recent research suggests that thinking about our lives in terms of choices may reduce  our support for public policies that promote greater equality in society."

In an attempt to identify worldview sets that appear to be responsible for significantly  different behaviors, I use a questionnaire about basic beliefs that divide people into four  distinguishable groups. The groups have different psychological profiles and represent a  spectrum of behavioral patterns. The questionnaire is also used in self-assessments.

Studies like those above appear to support the hypothesis that existential assumptions  shape wide areas of our behavior. They also suggest that deeply embedded beliefs are  also mutable in the right circumstances. Otherwise, ideology trumps such a process.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Well Said 3   Interesting 3   Valuable 3  
Rate It | View Ratings

Paul Von Ward Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Paul Von Ward, with graduate degrees from Harvard (MPA)and Florida State University (MSc), is an independent scholar and interdisciplinary cosmologist. His books are We've Never Been Alone (theory of advanced beings), The Soul Genome (more...)

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Twelve 2012 Myths

American Politics Go Deeper Than Politics

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend