Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 15 Share on Twitter 1 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds   

America's Politcal Groupies

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages)   No comments
Become a Premium Member Would you like to know how many people have read this article? Or how reputable the author is? Simply sign up for a Advocate premium membership and you'll automatically see this data on every article. Plus a lot more, too.
Author 42314
Message Rafe Pilgrim

America's traditional political parties; i.e., the Democratic Party and the Republican Party, have in reality long lost any resemblance to whatever their original and traditional partisan postures and ethics were, notwithstanding that such are still broadcast across the land as cover for what a candidate's real intentions and even history are. But the partisan loyalists, flags a'flyin', can't seem to grasp this; they still loudly cheering their labeled candidates along on as if they represented the ideals of a Roosevelt or a Lincoln.

Then when thinking about it, we could imagine that the person who originally coined the term "party" to describe a group of like political persuasions indeed might have done so with a wry smile expressing not respect but perhaps disdain for such a grouping.

But now it has become so abundantly clear from the TV stages that the even the term "party" is too lofty a label for the flag-waving cheerleaders of their staged idols preaching promises of nirvana to come and even newly invented history, and thus perhaps the coined term "party" should be replaced by something more descriptive in today's reality. And as a matter of fact, we do have a more contemporary and more appropriate term at our disposal -- not the worn-out Democratic and Republican Parties, but the more appropriately labeled Groupies.

Completely impossible pretenders aside, I would suggest that at least for now we recognize four collections of Groupies--well actually perhaps only three, with a fourth of more elevated morality than the other three. And here they are in Groupy code:

(G1) Those individuals seeking financial exploitation or sheer personal power

(G2) Those believing the dodges of that first group

(G3) Those who are born and will die Republican or Democrat because it's tattooed on their brains

(G4) those -- perhaps actually above "groupy" classification -- who see or sense exploitation but are too small in their numbers to have any impact.

Next Page  1  |  2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).


Rate It | View Ratings

Rafe Pilgrim Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Leaving behind a treacherous government now addicted to perpetual war, its limitlessly greedy and power-lusting masters, as well as the retarded albeit smirky Republicans and their evermore clonish Democrat colleagues, a braindead electorate (more...)
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Military to Police American Civilians!?

Hillary Insufficiently Lesser-Evil

Republican-Democrat Inc. vs the People

The Mass Atrocities We Allow and Pay For

Beware the Lesser-Evil-Choice Canard

Facts or Fiction on the Wall Street Occupation

To View Comments or Join the Conversation: