The global warming debate is over. It's a redundant distraction to the actuality
of global environmental destruction. The
point of the debate is not to find out if the planet is warming, the point of
the debate is to determine if human machines are polluting the planet on such a
grand scale as to spur global warming. The
debate is supposed to be scientific, but is politicized by the usual clichà ©s of
fascist right wingers and wussy lefties, or is that wussy right wingers and
fascist lefties? I get it mixed up now
and then, or they mix me up more and more I should say. Political discourse has entered scientific
debate and distracted us from the real question. Is human activity negatively altering the
environment? Yes it is. Is it so altering the environment as to be
causing rapid warming? Inconsequential
to the matter of change. Whatever the
temperature is, the water and ice are now tainted by pollution of many forms.
The debate of
global warming never was a real debate.
It was and remains a political distraction, not scientific discourse. The global warming question distracts people
from the evidence of global environmental destruction and the ultimate decision
of changing the oligarchical energy distribution systems responsible for most
pollution, like petrol and nuclear. The
debate is politicized and not scientific, for even now with global dimming an accepted
reality, (look it up, like a scientist) most "scientists' are not considering
everything that is scientifically understood as fact, making the worst mistake
a scientist could make; omitting information that is already known. They also commonly make the second worst
mistake a scientist could make; omitting the potential of unknowns influencing
their considerations, results and predictions.
Is the global
exhaust of millions of petrol powered factories and millions of cars influencing
the earth and the atmosphere? Or is the earth
warming part of a solar cycle? Who the
heck cares? If you are caught up by the
global warming debate, you are missing the point and have been led down a
vortex of butterfly effects and chaos theories ignoring the obtuse and obvious
smog, soot and industrial crap in your air, water and food. The unending debate of global warming is moot
and used a distraction to consideration of the real problem, global
environmental destruction. The point of
considering global warming is to consider global pollution and ultimately global
environmental destruction. Yet global
pollution, directly caused by the oligarchical collectivism between energy
industries and states is evident, and is often unconsidered because of the
ongoing global warming debate.
The scientist James
Lovelock, who originated the Gaia Theory, is locked in the global warming debate,
and is himself (if not the scientific community at large) incompetent, possibly
corrupt and presents ideas which are sometimes basic stabs in the dark. The former global warming advocate recently
stated, "so-called "sustainable development' " is meaningless drivel " We
rushed into renewable energy without any thought. The schemes are largely hopelessly inefficient
and unpleasant. I personally can't stand
windmills at any price... (windmills) are ugly and useless." Lovelock is a supporter of nuclear experiment
power generation and expanded use of natural gas, which is some mental
environmental perspective when one considers these destructive, altering
industries.
Whole regions have been made uninhabitable via
the status quo of the petrolithic era and nuclear era and the whole planet has
been degraded by these operations. There
is no question that the oligarchical collectivism and globalization of today
are unsustainable and beyond that totally destructive, like repeatedly crapping
in one's own bed. The debate of global
warming is moot and made to distract people from the fact that the crap of our
machinery and mechanizations is destroying life on the planet.
The global
institutionalization of petrol and nuclear industry is destroying the
planet. Do the ice caps have to melt
before the global warming debate might cease for a moment to do something about
the fouled air, water and food? Global
pollution and the environmental destruction of the earth is obvious, apparent
and affronting. The oligarchical status
quo of globalization and institutionalization has resulted in pollutants and
toxins which permeate the oceans once thought to be limitless and pierced the
atmosphere.
What is known
about global environmental destruction is enough to institute drastic change in
order to prevent drastic change. And the
change ought to start with changing the formation of institutions. Individuals, already burdened with bioaccumulative
toxins of all sorts, should not be the focus of the hardship of change. The burden of change should be placed on the
institutions of globalization, the source of the original hardship of global
pollution anyway.
Politics is about
nuanced views and at one time it was common science that our industrial byproducts
were heating up the planet. But that
nuance has come and gone, it is time to step up to the real deal. Mankind's collection of polluting oligarchical
energy systems are destroying the planet and the global warming debate only
catalyzes our island hopping, destructive behavior further. It is time to face the global environmental
destruction taking place as a result of the institutionalization of
globalization.
Mankind is negatively
altering the whole planet with our pollution.
We have made a new environment, one spawned from the petrolithic era and
the nuclear era, a physically detectable layer on the plane of all sorts of
poisons. These global systems of
oligarchical energy distribution are destroying life on the planet. All life and the whole planet has been
negatively altered by mankind's oligarchical energy industries.
The same fascist
and wussy loons, the same right wing cranks and left wing nuts who tout the
ingenuity of human institutions will deny alternative systems of energy delivery
to the oligarchical status quo of today whether petrol or nuclear. Well NASA, supposedly on the technological
forefront uses solar power in their satellites.
NASA once launched a plutonium powered satellite, which naturally came
crashing down, (SNAP 9A) causing "climate change' and further pollution and
again alluding to hubristic and ill thought out science. The fact is our oligarchical energy
industries are destroying Mother Earth.
The fact is that Fukushima and the BP Gulf of Mexico oil spill is causing
direct, obvious and affronting "climate change.' And the fact is such oligarchical industries
more than likely restrict and inhibit energy distribution systems, like solar,
which are not oligarchical formations. The
global warming debate is over. As is any
debate on global environmental destruction.
It is occurring and requires institutional change. Clean water, no matter the temperature.