Power of Story Send a Tweet        
- Advertisement -

Share on Google Plus 2 Share on Twitter 2 Share on Facebook 2 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 1 (7 Shares)  

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   No comments
OpEdNews Op Eds

A Look At The Fast Track Bill Shows It's The Wrong Thing To Do

By   Follow Me on Twitter     Message Dave Johnson       (Page 1 of 3 pages)     Permalink

Related Topic(s): ; ; , Add Tags  Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 2   Valuable 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H3 4/21/15

Author 4387
Become a Fan
  (12 fans)
- Advertisement -

Reprinted from Campaign For America's Future

From twitter.com/TheAntiMedia1/status/589646410028429312/photo/1: Activism against TPP
Activism against TPP
(Image by Twitter User lekatdotnet)
  Permission   Details   DMCA

The "fast track" trade promotion authority bill has been introduced in the Senate. Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution says, "The Congress shall have power to ... regulate commerce with foreign nations." But under fast track, Congress relinquishes that power and agrees to pass trade bills brought to them by the executive branch in a very short timeframe with little debate and without making any changes should any problems present themselves.

- Advertisement -

Though it was announced that this year's fast track bill was the result of a "deal" between Sens. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) and Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) the 2015 bill is nearly identical to the 2014 bill that died in Congress without support for a vote. See this side-by-side comparison from Rep. Sander Levin of the House Ways and Means Committee. It is unclear from this comparison why the "negotiations" between Hatch and Wyden took so long, and what Wyden got that enabled him to put his name on it, enabling the bill to be sold as "bipartisan."

Fast Track Sets Aside Normal Procedure

Congress does not set aside normal procedure, debate, the ability to fix problems that turn up and agree to vote within 90 days except for trade agreements -- even though trade agreements have now proven to have such a tremendous and often detrimental effect on our economy, jobs, wages and inequality. Where did the idea to do this come from? According to Public Citizen, this unusual procedure was "initially created by President Richard Nixon to get around public debate and congressional oversight."

- Advertisement -

Even for trade agreements, this use of the fast track process for the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) would be unusual. Usually fast track is set up by Congress before a trade agreement is negotiated. This way Congress can at least say who to negotiate with and lay out a set of objectives they are directing the administration to achieve.

But the TPP agreement that this fast track process will apply to is already nearly completed! So for TPP only, fast track's special procedures to bypass the usual process -- short time period, limited debate, no amendments -- are only for pushing the agreement through, without the pre-designation of trade partners, objectives, and other matters that some say justifies doing so.

In essence, this fast track bill, if it passes, pre-approves TPP before anyone even knows what is in it and without Congress saying in advance what should be in it.

A Quick Way To Decide If You Are For Fast Track

If you don't want to get mired in the wording and details of the fast track bill, here is a shortcut to deciding if you are for it or against it:

-- Most Republicans in Congress are for it. In particular, the "establishment" Republicans generally are seen as in the pocket of Wall Street, giant multinational corporations and lobbyists are for it. (Note that many "Constitution-based" Tea Party Republicans are opposed to it.)

- Advertisement -
-- Most Democrats in Congress are against it.

-- Wall Street and the giant multinational corporations are for it big time.

-- Every single U.S. labor union is against it.

-- The Chamber of Commerce, Business Roundtable and other corporate organizations are for it.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3


- Advertisement -

Must Read 2   Valuable 1  
View Ratings | Rate It


Dave has more than 20 years of technology industry experience. His earlier career included technical positions, including video game design at Atari and Imagic. He was a pioneer in design and development of productivity and educational (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon Share Author on Social Media   Go To Commenting

The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Related Topic(s): ; ; , Add Tags
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Three Charts To Email To Your Right-Wing Brother-In-Law

Upcoming Trans-Pacific Partnership Looks Like Corporate Takeover

Actually, "the Rich" Don't "Create Jobs," We Do

Now We Know Why Huge TPP Trade Deal Is Kept Secret From The Public

Does Clinton Really Oppose TPP? There Is A Test For That

Will TPP Kill The Post Office?