Power of Story Send a Tweet        
- Advertisement -

Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 2 (2 Shares)  

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   3 comments
OpEdNews Op Eds

"Senator McCain is absolutely right"

By       Message Kevin Zeese       (Page 1 of 2 pages)     Permalink

Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; , Add Tags  (less...)  Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Author 690
Become a Fan
  (62 fans)
- Advertisement -

This may have been the debate Obama needed, but was it the debate the United States needed? 

“Senator McCain and I agree,” “I think Senator McCain would agree” “Senator McCain is absolutely right” – over and over, a dozen times in 90 minutes,  Senator Obama expressed his agreement with Senator McCain.  

- Advertisement -

Why was Obama agreeing with McCain?  Was it a tactic to show his bi-partisanship, his ‘nice-guy’ personality and his ability to get along with political adversaries?  Is this how Obama would govern?   

Sen.  McCain did not return the favor.  As often as Obama expressed agreement, McCain snarled at Obama, talked down to him and called him naïve, ignorant, uninformed and mistaken.  McCain would not even look at Obama.  He seemed like someone who felt “I should not have to be debating this guy, this inexperienced new-comer – I’m better than him and should be given the presidency.”  McCain talked over Obama whenever he tried to correct the record when McCain repeatedly misstated Obama’s positions. 

- Advertisement -

CNN reported that independent voters did not react well to the negative comments. As a tactic Obama’s nice-guy strategy seemed to work.  All the post-election polls showed Obama “winning” the debate by up to 14%. Voters saw Obama as better on Iraq as well as the economy. This is also being reflected in the tracking polls, the Gallup daily presidential tracking poll taken September 25-27 shows Obama leading McCain 50%-42% The Rasmussen Reports automated daily presidential tracking poll for September 28 shows Obama leading McCain 50%-44%. So, the approach served him well but did it serve the United States?  Don’t we need a real debate on the critical issues the country is facing at this crossroads moment in U.S. history? 

On what issues did they agree – Russia, Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan, energy, Georgia, nuclear power, clean coal, the bailout – just some of the biggest issues we face.  Even on Iraq differences were blurred as Obama made it clear his exit would be slow and cautious, a victory not a defeat.   Or, does Obama really believe that it was wrong of Russia to respond to Georgia’s invasion of S. Ossetia?  Does he really believe that expanding the war in Afghanistan is the solution to that conflict?  Or, that missle defense, that has not been shown to work, is necessary to protect the U.S. from North Korea and Iran?

If you are an American who wants to see a foreign policy based on militarism come to an end then you had to be disappointed with the first debate.  If you don’t think the bailout of Wall Street and big banks is the right approach, you did not hear a viewpoint you could support.  If you recognize that we live an interdependent world where we should be emphasizing working with other nations in a cooperative way rather than trying to be ‘independent’ on issues like energy, then you had no spokesperson in the debate. 

- Advertisement -

This is a grave time for the United States:  two ongoing wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, shots exchanged between U.S. and Pakistani troops, ongoing conflict with Iran and escalating conflict with Russia.  Not only is all of this draining the U.S. military and their families but it is also draining the U.S. treasury at a time when the treasury is empty.  Iraq alone is costing $10 billion a month – money we are borrowing from other countries the U.S. is competing with.    

On the foreign policy front the U.S. would have been better served by a broader debate.  Candidates who advocate a less militaristic foreign policy, bringing troops home from the more than 700 bases the U.S. has around the world, or shrinking the U.S. defense budget – currently as large as the whole world combined.    

Next Page  1  |  2

 

- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Kevin Zeese is co-chair of Come Home America, www.ComeHomeAmerica.US which seeks to end U.S. militarism and empire. He is also co-director of Its Our Economy, www.ItsOurEconomy.US which seeks to democratize the economy and give people greater (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon Share Author on Social Media   Go To Commenting

The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Why I Was Among Eight Health Care Advocates to Get Arrested in the Senate Yesterday

The Seeds of Rebellion Are Taking Root, and Protests Against Injustices Are Blooming Across the Country

BREAKING NEWS: BIG BREAKTHROUGHS FOR SINGLE PAYER HEALTH CARE

Ron Paul Press Conference Unifies Third Party and Independent Candidates Around Four Key Positions

Paperless Electronic Voting Machines Flipping Votes from Obama to McCain in West Virginia

Max Baucus Should Not Be Deciding Health Care for America