Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   1 comment

The manipulative pro-war argument in Libya - Salon.com

Quicklink submitted By   Follow Me on Twitter     Message Dr Stuart Jeanne Bramhall     Permalink
Related Topic(s): ; , Add Tags

Well Said 1   Valuable 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Author 47501
Become a Fan
  (67 fans)
Advocating for the U.S.'s military action in Libya, The New Republic's John Judis lays out the argument which many of his fellow war advocates are making: that those who oppose the intervention are guilty of indifference to the plight of the rebels and to Gadaffi's tyranny. Note how, in Judis' moral world, there are only two possibilities: one can either support the American military action in Libya or be guilty of a "who cares?" attitude toward Gadaffi's butchery. At least as far as this specific line of pro-war argumentation goes, this is just 2003 all over again. Back then, those opposed to the war in Iraq were deemed pro-Saddam: indifferent to the repression and brutalities suffered by the Iraqi people at his hands and willing to protect his power.

Read the rest of the story HERE:

At www.salon.com

- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -