In his dissent, Justice Stevens said no principle required overruling two major campaign finance precedents. "The only relevant thing that has changed since" those decisions, he wrote, "is the composition of this court..."While American democracy is imperfect," he wrote, "few outside the majority of this court would have thought its flaws included a dearth of corporate money in politics." |
Read the rest of the story HERE:

At www.nytimes.com
Sheila Samples is an Oklahoma writer and a former civilian US Army Public Information Officer. She is a Managing Editor for OpEd News, and a regular contributor for a variety of Internet sites.