From this NYT story, we learn that Huawei's "charm offensive" as it seeks to take the lead in 5G networks in Europe "seems to be working," despite concerns abt "national security." Altho the piece reads as propaganda against China (and Trump), it actually blacks out the gravest threat posed by 5G: not surveillance but health effects of radiation. Is it possible that Matina Stevis-Gridneff, the Times's Brussels correspondent, somehow hasn't heard that Brussels banned 5G last spring? The Times is serving as an propaganda mill for the "rollout". Why has the Times blacked out that inconvenient datum about Brussels? Business partnership with Verizon, and the related financial interest of Carlos Slim, who made billions in the cell phone racket throughout South America, and who owns more of the NYTimes than any other single shareholder. Mark Crispin Miller