I think we ALL agree that 9/11 was EXTREMELY convenient for the Bush Administration considering what they wanted to do. The question is, did they do nothing and hope and pray that something like 9/11 would happen, or, did they prefer to have insurance and take steps to insure the success of the attacks? The argument that "they would never" has been shown to be invalid time and time again. Is there information to suggest the latter? I think if we are honest with ourselves, the answer to that is yes (what do all of the lies, inconsistencies and omissions mean). Could we be wrong? I think if we are honest with ourselves, the answer to that is also yes. Should the possibility be ignored? Should the possibility be taken seriously? The possibility should ABSOLUTELY NOT be ignored.
I don't think they are the praying kind. Maybe for photo-ops.
This shouldn't turn into "my theory is better than yours."
I hope the questions asked are discussed. Thank you.
1
1
1
