I have 13 fans: Become a Fan. You'll get emails whenever I post articles on OpEdNews
A creative thinker on matters of public policy and art, and a principal researcher. Current focus of work is on the strategies democracies can use to protect against overthrow by corruption, with immediate attention to the mess being made by plutocrats in the US.
(4 comments) SHARE Saturday, March 24, 2012 Our corrupt politics is all about money: Reviewing Ezra Klein's NYRB Lessig review
Contrary to Ezra Klein's New York Review of Books criticism of Larry Lessig's book, the cause of the growing partisanship in Congress sinvce 1976 is money in politics, along with other dysfunctions caused by the Supreme Court's distortions of the First Amendment to serve plutocracy. Though right about the centrality of money in politics, Lessig's solutions are dangerously non-strategic and defective.
(17 comments) SHARE Friday, January 13, 2012 Reversing Citizens United: stripping the Roberts 5 of power over elections
There is no need to amend the Constitution to solve the problem of money in politics - which is the source of corporate political power and much of the excessive inequality their money buys. The founders already anticipated the problem of a plutocratic Court and provided the complete solution. Under the Constitution Art III, Sec 2, Cl 2 Congress can strip the Court of the power to hear any case involving money in politics.
(2 comments) SHARE Wednesday, November 16, 2011 Does the Same First Amendment Apply to the 1% and the 99%?
Free speech protection for Occupy protesters relies on the same principle that the Supreme Court uses to install the 1% in power. If the Supreme Court can stretch the meaning of speech so far as to rule that unlawful and corrupting money in politics is actually protected speech, then first amendment protection for the Occupy encampment strategy should be a slam dunk.
(6 comments) SHARE Thursday, August 25, 2011 Five reasons why a constitutional amendment is the wrong way to get money out of politics
What is necessary, sufficient and possible is comprehensive legislation to get money out of politics. A law can also get the Supreme Court out of elections by using the Exceptions Clause power of Congress to restrict the Supreme Court's jurisdiction to hear appeals of any election cases. The campaign should be waged against the Supreme Court directly, not against the Constitution.
(1 comments) SHARE Tuesday, August 9, 2011 What's a President Not to Like About a Line-Item Veto?
Had the debt ceiling not been raised, Obama would have been empowered to cut the government's budget by deleting program expenditures, other than Social Security and Medicare. With this power Obama could have punished his Republican opponents. That is why before Obama, no previous Congress has ever given the President such power over budget expenditures. But Obama did not want this power, so he tied his own hands.
(6 comments) SHARE Tuesday, June 28, 2011 Roberts 5 strike another blow for plutocracy: Arizona Free Enterprise Club v. Bennett
They got away with stealing a presidential election with Bush v.Gore in 2000. They got away with opening the Citizens United corporate money spigot in 2010. On a roll, the Supreme Court has done it again. They guarantee that privately funded candidates can always outspend publicly funded candidates. This destroys the last hope to avoid confrontation. Congress must use its authority to get the Court out of elections.
(1 comments) SHARE Friday, November 5, 2010 Midterms Lesson: Money Out of Politics
The dramatic midterm results were caused by two disparate forces: tea party desire for defunding a corrupt federal government and progressive withdrawal of support for that government. If they combine to attack the source of corruption - money in politics, they could mop up the mess in Washingon.