Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   No comments
OpEdNews Op Eds

All big bro 43 has said are lies.

By winston  Posted by (about the submitter)     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

- Advertisement -
All big bro 43 has said are lies.


It is getting hard to weave your way through the tangled web of deceit.

- Advertisement -
No one other than W says in Iraq Al-Qaeda is the US' biggest threat. Iraqis don't want the US arming the Sunnis, but, as per usual, this concept is all confused. Commonsense makes you realize that W's hidden agenda is to have a perpetual war in the region so as to remain close to the, Wolfowitz labeled, "sea of oil".

Why are we there if Maliki can say "US Not Needed Here" and a US general can say that "good and honest Iraqis" are killing US soldiers.

The article "Mahdi Army, Not Al-Qaeda, is Enemy No. 1 in Western Baghdad" at

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/07/15/AR2007071501248.html

refutes W's lie about al-queda in Iraq being our biggest enemy. W's phrasing is vague, but in Baghdad, Sadr's "Death Squad" has always been the group to fear and lately they have overrun Western Baghdad, which was formerly a Sunni enclave.
The article states "West Rashid confounds the prevailing narrative from top U.S. military officials that the Sunni insurgent group al-Qaeda in Iraq is the city's most formidable and disruptive force. While there are signs that the group has been active in the area, over the past several months, the Mahdi Army has transformed the composition of the district's neighborhoods by ruthlessly killing and driving out Sunnis and denying basic services to residents who remain. Gen. David H. Petraeus, the top U.S. military commander in Iraq, described the area as "one of the three or four most challenging areas in all of Baghdad."

- Advertisement -

Dominance by Shiite militias is typically associated with places in eastern Baghdad, such as Sadr City, while areas west of the Tigris River and south of the Baghdad airport road are home to large Sunni enclaves. Not long ago the western neighborhoods conformed clearly with this perception. U.S. soldiers estimate that a year ago, Sunnis made up about 80 percent of the population there and Shiites 20 percent. But those numbers have now reversed, after a concerted effort to cleanse Sunnis from the area, according to U.S. military officials."

Why has the death rate gone down? Sectarian killings dropped to their lowest level of the past four months in June. But the downturn in violence in Shiite-dominated areas was not necessarily encouraging, Capt. Jay Wink, the battalion's intelligence officer said.

"Now that the Sunnis are all gone, murders have dropped off. One way to put it is they ran out of people to kill."

The article "Mistrust as Iraqi Troops Encounter New U.S. Allies" at


click here



describes how one of the few positives aspects of "Mission Accomplished" thus far--how the Sunnis in Anbar Province have allegedly driven out Al-Qaeda there, really might not be such a success after all.

The article states "The United States has placed great hope in its deepening ties with Sunni leaders like Abu Azzam who have vowed to fight Islamist militants. But his mostly Sunni group, the Volunteers, is different from the American-allied tribes in the Sunni heartland of Anbar Province, in part because it patrols only 40 minutes from central Baghdad and close to large Shiite districts. So American commanders view this as a crucial test case for whether Shiite leaders will tolerate new alliances with Sunni groups."

If Iraqi Shiites aren't convinced, how can the US be? Obviously they can't-so when W brags about this he's just flailing around for any glimmer of hope for his propaganda machine to use.

- Advertisement -
The predominantly Shiite military group is the Muthanna Brigade. The article continues "A watershed of sorts came in late April. After a Muthanna Brigade checkpoint was attacked by gunmen, 50 Iraqi soldiers stormed a schoolhouse then serving as Abu Azzam's makeshift headquarters, arresting dozens of men and shoving some into the trunks of Humvees. Enraged Sunnis who live nearby charged to the scene.
An American officer, Capt. Larry Obst, arrived with 10 soldiers just as a riot threatened to break out, with more than 500 people bearing down on the Iraqi soldiers, who were "getting ready to shoot into the crowd," he said. After hours of frantic American intervention, the Iraqi soldiers left without the detainees.
The episode hardened the mistrust between the American and Iraqi units, he said, "but it built credibility with the people."

Our soldiers shouldn't be subjected to this uncertainty which just compounds the hazards of urban guerrilla warfare. Lt. Col. Kurt Pinkerton has spent the past months alternatingly cultivating his relationship with Abu Azzam and fearing that Abu Azzam was seconds away from attacking US soldiers.

The article continues "Yet the men in Colonel Pinkerton's unit, the Second Battalion of the Fifth Cavalry Regiment, remain conflicted about the risks of joining forces with men who may have attacked them before. Master Sgt. Carlos Figueroa says some Volunteers remind him of drug dealers who try to go straight but always hedge their bets. "These guys are never going to completely give up these ties," he said.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

/* The Petition Site */
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact EditorContact Editor
Related Topic(s): , Add Tags
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Bush planned the economic crisis for partisan GOP gain.

Why did we all hate Palin?

Why is Obama protecting 43?

"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing."

What happens to US credibility if Spain finds them guilty and we don't?

Bush, with criminal intent, planned the economic crisis for partisan GOP gain.