Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 8 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds   

Crackpot Christians Blame Darwin for Hitler

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages)   2 comments
Message Walter Uhler
Become a Fan
  (18 fans)
Crackpot Christianity: Part Two
During the weekend of August 26-27, 2006, Americans were given another opportunity to see "Crackpot Christianity" in action. All they had to do was tune in to The Coral Ridge Hour and watch its presentation of Darwin's Deadly Legacy. I watched it Saturday evening and was respectively amused and appalled by the show's infantilism and dishonesty. Although it would not persuade any educated American, the show's dishonesty implies a staggering contempt for its intended audience -- the untaught.

Knowing the audience, I expected such buffoonery and mendacity. As I demonstrated in an earlier article (Crackpot Christianity and America's Current Moral Degeneration, at, the overwhelming majority of America's Christians know next to nothing about the origins and actual composition -- let alone the myriad contradictions -- of the holy book they ostensibly revere. Why would they know anything more about the evolutionary biology so many of them despise?

In addition, I already had read the asinine assertion made by the program's foremost crackpot Christian, Dr. D. James Kennedy: "To put it simply, no Darwin, no Hitler." It prompted an immediate response from Abraham H. Foxman, National Director of the Anti-Defamation League: "This is an outrageous and shoddy attempt by D. James Kennedy to trivialize the horrors of the Holocaust...Trivializing the Holocaust comes from either ignorance at best or, at worst, a mendacious attempt to score political points in the culture war on the backs of six million Jewish victims and other who died at the hands of the Nazis."

Moreover, Mr. Foxman noted: "It must be remembered that D. James Kennedy is a leader among a distinct group of 'Christian Supremacists' who seek to "reclaim America for Christ" and turn the U.S. into a Christian nation guided by their strange notions of biblical law." In other words, a crackpot Christian.

But, when Mr. Foxman observed, "Hitler did not need Darwin to devise his heinous plan to exterminate the Jewish people," he didn't know he was making a point that already had been conceded by one of the show's few serious scholars, Richard Weikart. Mr. Foxman didn't know, because Professor Weikart's concession doesn't appear in Kennedy's sixty-minute propaganda piece, but in Weikart's own book From Darwin to Hitler.

Granted, Professor Weikart "became convinced that there were significant historical connections between Darwinism and Hitler's ideology" [From Darwin to Hitler, p. x]. But he refused to make "the absurd claim that Darwinism of logical necessity leads (directly or indirectly) to Nazism." [Ibid. p. 9]

Moreover, in the concluding chapter of his book, Weikart notes: "It would be foolish to blame Darwinism for the Holocaust, as though Darwinism leads logically to the Holocaust. No, Darwinism by itself did not produce Hitler's worldview, and many Darwinists drew quite different conclusions from Darwinism for ethics and social thought than did Hitler." [Ibid, p. 232]

Unfortunately, the dishonesty of Darwin's Deadly Legacy extends far beyond that fact that the show's one serious historian, unbeknownst to the audience, actually disputes Kennedy's crackpot assertion: "No Darwin, No Hitler." The show also quotes Darwin out of context, takes cheap shots at Planned Parenthood and the ACLU, misrepresents the court's ruling in "Kitzmiller, et al. v. Dover Area School District, et al." and turns to one of its "historians" to inform us that the "Nazis loved science."

Worse, after showing pictures of the Nazi death camps, viewers hear that Darwin's ideas made the whole thing possible. Moreover, the show informs its viewers that the wicked theory of evolution played a major role in the shootings a Columbine High School. Worse still, it then notes -- presumably with the intention of insinuating a connection -- that there have been dozens of school shootings since Columbine. Even if such innuendo had substance, such crimes would pale in significance when compared with the murderous history of Christianity.

The show also trots out two legitimate scientists who claim to have found holes in the theory of evolution. One supports microevolution, but discounts macroevolution. The other supports Intelligent Design, notwithstanding the fact that his "own department's website disowns his bizarre ideas." [Jerry Coyne, "Coultergeist,"The New Republic, see link below].

Unfortunately, the show fails to acknowledge that these two scientists are members of a small minority. It also fails to acknowledge that the overwhelming majority of America's scientists find the theory of evolution convincing, because it works.

Works? Yes, as Jared Diamond has observed: "Without evolution, one has no chance of understanding the living world around us, human uniqueness, genetic diseases and their possible cures, and genetically engineered crops and their possible dangers." [Ernst Mayr, What Evolution Is, pp. ix-x] Or, as the highly esteemed Ernst Mayr observed: "Evolution is the most important concept in biology. There is not a single Why? question in biology that can be answered adequately without a consideration of evolution." [Ibid, xiii]

Dr. Kennedy's failure to disclose the minority position of the show's two scientists was hardly an accident. He needed to deceive viewers in order to assure them that that the theory of evolution is "crumbling."

Unfortunately, none of these distortions in Darwin's Deadly Legacy so clearly demonstrate the contempt with which these crackpot Christians view their audience as does the very appearance of Ann Coulter. Having Ann Coulter appear in a show devoted to evolution is like going to the Governor's Ball and finding a turd in the punch bowl. It's simply outrageous.

Because I've already done my time in purgatory by reviewing one of Ms. Coulter's books for the San Francisco Chronicle (see ), suffice it to say that, except for the 2 million or so pathetic and witless kool-aid drinkers who mindlessly adore her, Darwin's Deadly Legacy would have gained greater mass credibility, had its producers decided to ask Bozo the Clown to pontificate on evolution.

(Note: For an exquisite critique of Coulter's profound ignorance of biology, I strongly urge the reader to turn to Professor Jerry Coyne's precious essay "Coultergeist" .)

Next Page  1  |  2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Rate It | View Ratings

Walter Uhler Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Walter C. Uhler is an independent scholar and freelance writer whose work has been published in numerous publications, including The Nation, the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, the Journal of Military History, the Moscow Times and the San (more...)
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The Grand Jury Report: Part two of "What did Joe Paterno know and when did he know it?"

Three False Assertions by the Grand Jury turned the Press and Public against Joe Paterno and Penn State

New, Previously Suppressed Grand Jury Testimony and Joe Paterno: Part four of "What did Joe Paterno know and when...

What did Joe Paterno know and when did he know it? Part One

Incompetent Journalists at the Philadelphia Inquirer Slandered Joe Paterno

Hitting Penn State's Board of Trustees Where it Hurts

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend