Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on LinkedIn Share on Reddit Tell A Friend Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites
Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

LLY gets shocking (!!??) court decision

By       Message Virginia Simson       (Page 1 of 3 pages)     Permalink    (# of views)   3 comments

Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) , Add Tags  (less...)
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Author 1670
Become a Fan
  (6 fans)
- Advertisement -
Don't let the lawsuits FLY, let them stockpile until this drug is history.
As posted in
- Advertisement -
"Clinical Psychology and Psychiatry:
A Closer Look" Blog


Let the Lawsuits Fly

From a press release from Prescription Access Litigation...

- Advertisement -
A U.S. District Court judge today issued a decision
allowing to go forward a class action lawsuit that alleged that Eli Lilly & Co. (NYSE: LLY) fraudulently marketed the atypical
antipsychotic drug, Zyprexa, for uses not approved by the FDA. Judge Jack B. Weinstein, of the U.S. District Court, Eastern District of NY, denied Eli Lilly's motion for summary judgment, as well as a summary judgment motion filed by the plaintiffs.


The 14-page order highlighted the importance of the Courts in protecting the public in the arena of prescription drugs. The Judge stated:


"Under the present organization of the pharmaceutical industry, the official federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and the plaintiffs' bar, the courts are arguably in the strongest position to effectively enforce appropriate standards protecting the
public from fraudulent merchandising of drugs." (Opinion, pp. 3-4)

- Advertisement -
The entirety of the judge's latest ruling can be seen here. This is a potentially big story, but I have little time to discuss it now. Maybe later...

Okay, MY preliminary comments.

1. But clearly,
the legal department at Eli Lilly DID approve these uses. They knew that they could, and probably would, get sued after extending beyond the FDA approved uses. This rises many points:

What kinds of lawyers are these ..?

I have posted about the head of their legal department previously. He is considered a 'fine' attorney.
But whose interest IS he looking out for?

How big are the financial rewards that they are getting that they would risk this kind of hideous exposure of their moral bankruptcy ..?

Afterall, the persons to whom they are illegally selling this drug are youth and old people, who in many cases were given NO CHOICE about whether to take it or not.

How did they drown out ALL voices of dissent about what was going on? Were they taking too much of their own medications ..?

2. There is the obvious question of
who was watching The Watchers ..?

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3


- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

Virginia Simson is a blogger - as well as a blog on the uranium industry and hydraulic fracking at which anticipated the Japanese meltdowns. She has a large archive of material on (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon Share Author on Social Media   Go To Commenting

The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Infragard - First in a series

State-wide Foreclosure Moratorium: How to Get One

NOW Is the time to learn about the SPP. A tutorial

Torture, the CIA, the NYT, war crimes and Mark Mansfield

Martial law! Earthquake(s)! What is at stake. Alarmist action alert

Sibelgate: US officials visiting Turkey NOW