Power of Story Send a Tweet        
- Advertisement -
Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

Either Fight Like A Big Dog, or Stay on The Porch

By   Follow Me on Twitter     Message Timothy Gatto       (Page 1 of 1 pages)     Permalink

Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Author 2586
Become a Fan
  (77 fans)
- Advertisement -
This entire Iraq misadventure has been one fiasco after another. Bush not only makes this country seem like the harbinger of doom, but the people who are ultimatly responsible for prosecuting this war, have seemed to have forgotten to put the Army on a war footing. Let me ask a question. How in the world can we send 140,000 men into a war zone, and not have a plan for a continued, prolonged conflict? According to the Army's Chief of Staff Gen. Peter J. Schoomaker, the Army "will break" under the stress of deployments to war-zones. According to The Washington Post, the General states that the Army started fighting this war "flat footed" and had an equipment shortage of about 56 Billion dollars. That to me is a hell of a way to start a war.

Where was Bush's head? If we didn't have the manpower or the equipment to successfully maintain our soldiers in the field, you have to ask the question why? Bush has been adamant about proclaiming that his "Generals on the ground" would get what they needed. So why is the Chief of Staff on Capitol Hill raising hell about the Army's lack of strength and not being able to cope with the present rotations that units make? He mentions that we have to "grow" the Army by 7,000 each year in order to meet the goal of keeping the amount of troops in the field that we have right now. He also mentions that circumstances in the future might also put a demand on the Army that they might not be able to meet.

It seems to me that I have written about this since we invaded Iraq. I'm not the only one who wrote that this nation was not sufficiently poised to handle a large scale invasion of another country without boosting the size of the regular Army. You can't rely on the Guard and Reserve indefinitely. It's not fair to the Guardsmen and Reservists to find them deploying to Iraq every other year. They write in the Post:

"The burden on the Army's 507,000 active-duty soldiers -- who now spend more time at war than at home -- is simply too great, he said. "At this pace, without recurrent access to the reserve components, through remobilization, we will break the active component," he said, drawing murmurs around the hearing room."

The "remobilization" he talks about is changing the way that the Department of Defense currently interprets the authorization that Congress has given the President. The authorization states the reservists be mobilized involuntarily only once, and for no more than 24 months. The active duty component spends more time deployed than it does at home.

General Shoomaker is right. The Army will "be broken" unless we address his concerns and do it right now. This president had the responsibility to make sure that the Army could do the job, and now, after three years at war, they are screaming for more mobilizations of the Guard and Reserves. That's not the answer either. If we are going to use the military to shape the world to our liking as seems to be the goal of this present administration, the least he could do is re-start the draft. This should be prerequisite to starting a major war. Bush can't have it both ways. We can't be constantly maintaining combat operations in the Middle East without increasing the size of our Army. I can't believe that the Chief of Staff of the United States Army has to slam his hand on a table and tell members of Congress that The Army is "broken".

Let me put my two cents in. Don't just "grow" the Army by 7,000 troops a year. That's just not enough. The General knows that 7,000 more soldiers isn't enough, but he thinks that asking for more would get him a flat no from congress. If we are going to solve our diplomatic problems militarily, we should have at least a million men on active duty. If North Korea were to step over the border and attack South Korea, we are bound by treaty to help defend South Korea. How will we do that when the bulk of our combat forces are in Iraq? I've seen so much incompetence in the last six years that I just have to ask. I'm worried. I'm afraid that Bush is putting this nation in military jeopardy. I pray that the 110th Congress moves quickly to restore our military's readiness, or get us the hell out of Iraq. We can't keep going the way we are. If the administration doesn't have the moxie to ask for a draft, it should have never started a war.

 

- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Tim Gatto is Ret. US Army and has been writing against the Duopoly for the last decade. He has two books on Amazon, Kimchee Days or Stoned Colds Warriors and Complicity to Contempt.

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon Share Author on Social Media   Go To Commenting

The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

S 1867: Killing The Bill of Rights and Declaring War on Americans

Arranging the Deck Chairs While Death Comes from Japan

The Fix is In. The Revolution is Coming.

Interview with Finian Cunningham: Bahrain and the U.S. Role

America Does not have a Functioning Democracy - President Jimmy Carter-- Yet MSM Keeps Serving Up Distractions

Prime-time Politics for the Masses