Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 7 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Exclusive to OpEd News:
OpEdNews Op Eds   

Iraq War – Report of 655,000 dead Iraqi's sounds Unbelievable, but it is Real and Credible

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages)   No comments
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Steven Leser
Become a Fan
  (9 fans)
The Foley scandal and how the Republican leadership dealt with it may show the hypocrisy behind Republican drumbeat of 'Moral Values' and the Abramoff and Ney scandal may show their greed and hubris, but 100 years from now, what people will remember about this era of American politics and policy is how our Iraq war killed well over half a million Iraqis.

I almost missed or dismissed the story completely and went a week without looking into it.

I have written before about how most journalists are besieged with conspiracy theories of all kinds being sent to them. With two verifiable and huge scandals to investigate, and with how quickly this report was dismissed and shrunk from the headlines, it was easy to write it off as some fringe group's reactionary outburst. Boy was I wrong.

My first clue that this was something more to investigate was when I heard the story was printed in the Lancet. Because I sometimes write articles on Science and Health topics, I get access to embargoed articles before they appear in the press or publications. The Lancet is one of those publications that reports on health breakthroughs and thus I have seen many articles from the Lancet over the past few years and became familiar with the quality of its content.

The Lancet is one of the top four Health publications in the world. Articles and reports that appear in the Lancet are written and researched by the top scientific and health minds in the world. They were subject to a rigorous peer review process where, before the article sees the light of day, it is provided to other scientists or medical professionals who analyze its content and methods. If the data does not stand up to scrutiny, the Lancet does not print it.

Breakthroughs in cancer research and treatment as well as many other of the biggest medical breakthroughs of the last two centuries have appeared in the Lancet. Chances are that the lives of people you know have been saved as the result of breakthrough research that has appeared in the Lancet. This is the publication that printed the report of 655,000 deaths.

The scientists who wrote the report are a group of top MDs and PhD's from no less than MIT and Johns Hopkins. They used research and statistical methodologies that are proven and have been used countless times before to estimate deaths in other conflicts. As I indicated, their research and methods was reviewed by other scientists before the Lancet printed it.

Throughout the rest of the world, the report has received a lot of attention and deservedly so. In the US it has received MUCH less than the coverage it deserves, mostly because of the quick and self-serving dismissal by President Bush. Among the bright spots was the October 13th article 'Counting the Iraqi Dead' by Eugene Robinson in the Washington Post, which said, among other things:

"It is understandable that the president would be quick to dismiss such an explosive claim, but the rest of us should take the time to look a bit more closely
The Johns Hopkins team reports being 95 percent certain that the true figure lies between about 400,000 and about 900,000 -- a large range of uncertainty that some critics have seized upon as discrediting the whole project.
But quite a lot of science went into the Johns Hopkins study. Even if you assume that the number of Iraqi civilians killed since the war began is at the very low end of the study's range, that's still a quantum leap from earlier estimates. We now have reputable evidence -- not proof, I'll allow, but science-based evidence from respected scholars, published in one of the world's most prestigious medical journals -- that the humanitarian tragedy in Iraq is much, much worse than anyone had suspected."

The Lancet study deserves a lot more than the dismissal it received from President Bush and much of the US Media. I recommend everyone read it and the full text can be seen at and the Lancet made available a podcast in .mp3 format which has the editor of the Lancet as well as one of the studies' authors, Gilbert Burnham, discussing the methodologies employed in the study. These discussions are essential listening material for anyone attempting to evaluate the credibility of the study and can be accessed and downloaded at .

Scientific findings by the best minds in the world in their respective fields, reviewed by peers who are also among the best minds in the world in their fields and then printed and published by the best periodicals in the world should not be dismissed because they are politically unpopular. As Eugene Robinson said in his article, "If the study's findings are flawed, then its critics should demonstrate how and why. But no one should dismiss these shocking numbers without fully examining them. No one should want to."
Rate It | View Ratings

Steven Leser Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

A political blogger for the International Business Times, Steve Leser is a hot national political pundit. He has appeared on MSNBC's Coundown with Keith Olbermann, Comedy Central's Daily Show with Jon Stewart and Russia Today's (RT) Crosstalk with (more...)
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

McCain Campaign Violated McCain-Feingold law with Palin Clothing Purchases

McCain attacked 18 year old Chelsea Clinton in 1998 now says Palin's family & kids are off limits

McCain says "Horseshit" on National TV During Debate

North Korea – Impending Missile Launch May Require US Military Action

Palin: Drill Baby Drill, but blame Obama for the Spill!

Palin to McCain - Oops I did it Again

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend