Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 1 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds   

Safer Airports across America

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages)     (# of views)   1 comment
Author 5429
Message Soraya Sepahpour-Ulrich
Become a Fan
  (19 fans)
- Advertisement -

Safer Airports across America


According to the latest report, airport screeners across America failed to catch as many as 75% of the bombs and weapons being smuggled by investigators past security checks at various airports across the nation[i].  Ironically, the potential threat this poses to the average passenger is far less than the danger from those who in the name of protecting us from ‘terorists’, not only terrorize us, but take the life of innocent people in our airports; the 45-year old Carol Anne Gotbaum being a case in point. 


There is however, a simple solution to solving this problem.  And the American people have Michael B. Kraft and Brett Wallace to thank for the solution.  In an opinion piece entitled “Iran's choice: planes or bombs?”(Washington Times, Oct. 17, 2007),  they eloquently argue that the United States has legislation which suspends landing rights to “airports which pose a safety threat”.  In addition, they argue:


Section 11552 of the Federal Aviation Act allows the same revocation for service to any nation which aids a terrorist organization that threatens aircraft.

- Advertisement -

It is no secret that the Bush administration has been supporting a terrorist group in Iraq; the Mojahedeen-e-Khalq (MEK), listed on the State Department’s list of Foreign Terrorist Groups and has given them ‘special persons status’[ii].   While the nation was coxed into waging a ‘war on terror’, Mr. Bush is giving protection to terrorists – our tax dollars support them in camp Ashraf.  Additionally,  the ‘political arm’ of the terrorist group MEK is in  Washington soliciting support from congressional members to replace the clergy in Iran.  They seem to have excellent PR and support.   

Furthermore, Mr. Cheney has shown his fondness for the terrorist militia -  the Jundallah.   The Vice President of the United States flew to Pakistan and in a meeting with President Musharraf discussed using the aforementioned terrorist group in order to undermine the Iranian regime[iii].  Terrorists are popular among the governing elite in the US as evidenced in the two examples here.  One must wonder when the Junballah will have their political office in Washington and put on their ‘fight for democracy’. 

- Advertisement -

Given that the highest officials of this nation are aiding, and indeed, co-opting terrorists, according to Section 11552 of the Federal Aviation Act, service to the nation should be revoked.  This would eliminate threats, and ‘death by suffocation’ of innocent passengers at our airports.  The slipping of bombs and weapons at security checks would no longer be an issue, and billions would be saved.   Of course  this  would translate to total boycott of America and Americans, a travel ban , and aside from the ports and borders, America would be ‘sanctioned’ and isolated – but it would be safer.   


In their article, Kraft and Wallace would like to apply this piece of legislation to Iran.  Not because they would like to see a safe Iran, but because they would like to tighten the sanctions on Iran and impose an air boycott.   They would also like to see aviation spare parts and maintenance services cut off – maximizing air incidents and deaths. 


America has always been the land of entrepreneurship.   With extraordinary talent, bright minds came here and made this country a leading nation.    It is reprehensible that lately we have seen a dark side surface and prevail all the while devising legal ways to commit mass murder, torture,  invade and destroy other countries.   Looking back, as the year 2000 approached, there was as much apprehension and fear in the air, if not more so, than there was the usual excitement of welcoming the new year.   Our worries were mostly about computer glitches.  Who would have thought that the year 2000 would bring with it the administration what would change the world and cause so much death and destruction?




[i] CNN travel watch October 18, 2007

- Advertisement -

[ii] US State Department Daily Briefing



- Advertisement -

Rate It | View Ratings

Soraya Sepahpour-Ulrich Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Soraya has lived and studied in-Iran, UK, France, and has obtained her Master's degree in Public Diplomacy from USC Annenberg and USC School for International Studies, Los Angeles.- She is an independent researcher, public speaker, radio (more...)
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Rude Awakening

Nukes and Temples

Samantha Power And The Age Of Genocide; Rwanda 1994 vs Gaza 2014

Abduction or Defection: The Case of Iran's Nuclear Scient

The Mushroom Effect

Blowback in Ferguson